Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19549776›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2009

Preclinical results of camptothecin-polymer conjugate (IT-101) in multiple human lymphoma xenograft models.

Tontanai Numbenjapon, Jianyi Wang, David Colcher, Thomas Schluep, Mark E Davis, Julienne Duringer, Leo Kretzner, Yun Yen, Stephen J Forman, Andrew Raubitschek

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02648711 (Evaluation of an Alternative Schedule for CRLX101 Alone in Combination With Bevacizumab and in Combination With mFOLFOX6 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumor Malignancies), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02648711 phase1terminatednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of an Alternative Schedule for CRLX101 Alone in Combination With Bevacizumab and in Combination With mFOLFOX6 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumor Malignancies

TypeinterventionalSponsorNewLink Genetics CorporationRan2015 to 2018Enrolled41ConditionsSolid TumorsArmsCRLX101, Bevacizumab, mFOLFOX6
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Correlating preclinical animal studies and human clinical trials of a multifunctional, polymeric nanoparticle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Serial diffusion MRI to monitor and model treatment response of the targeted nanotherapy CRLX101.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Pharmacokinetics and tumor dynamics of the nanoparticle IT-101 from PET imaging and tumor histological measurements.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Tontanai NumbenjaponCancer Immunotherapeutics and Tumor Immunology, Beckman Research Institute at City of Hope, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Jianyi Wang
David Colcher
Thomas Schluep
Mark E Davis
Julienne Duringer
Leo Kretzner
Yun Yen
Stephen J Forman
Andrew Raubitschek
City of Hope · USBeckman Research InstituteCalando Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USCalifornia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Transplant for Lymphoma:Therapy-Related LeukemiaP50CA107399 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI FORMAN, STEPHEN J, KWAK, LARRY W · 2004 to 2022
$35.5M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA107399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCamptothecin (CPT) has potent broad-spectrum antitumor activity by inhibiting type I DNA topoisomerase (DNA topo I). It has not been used clinically because it is water-insoluble and highly toxic. As a result, irinotecan (CPT-11), a water-soluble analogue of CPT, has been developed and used as salvage chemotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma, but with only modest activity. Recently, we have developed a cyclodextrin-based polymer conjugate of 20-(S)-CPT (IT-101). In this study, we evaluated the preclinical antilymphoma efficacy of IT-101 as compared with CPT-11. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe determined an in vitro cytotoxicity of IT-101, CPT-11, and their metabolites against multiple human lymphoma cell lines. In human lymphoma xenografts, the pharmacokinetics, inhibitions of tumor DNA topo I catalytic activity, and antilymphoma activities of these compounds were evaluated.

resultsIT-101 and CPT had very high in vitro cytotoxicity against all lymphoma cell lines tested. As compared with CPT-11 and SN-38, IT-101 and CPT had longer release kinetics and significantly inhibit higher tumor DNA topo I catalytic activities. Furthermore, IT-101 showed significantly prolonged the survival of animals bearing s.c. and disseminated human xenografts when compared with CPT-11 at its maximum tolerated dose in mice.

conclusionsThe promising present results provide the basis for a phase I clinical trial in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCamptothecinCell Line, TumorCyclodextrinsFemaleHumansIrinotecanLymphomaMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDPolymersTopoisomerase I InhibitorsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsCamptothecinCyclodextrinsIrinotecanIT-101PolymersTopoisomerase I Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID19549776
PMCPMC3245217
OpenAlexW2124880023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.