ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2009
Anal pressure in experimental diabetes.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of Boswellia serrata on antioxidant status in an experimental model of colitis rats induced by acetic acid.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDiabetes mellitus is a metabolic endocrine disorder that affects many systems, the gastrointestinal system often being among the affected systems. This experimental study work was designed to demonstrate altered anal sphincter pressures in an experimental model of diabetes mellitus (DM). MATERIALS AND
methodsMale Wistar rats (mean weight = 250 g) were used and randomized in two groups (n = 10): CO = control and DM. DM was induced by administering a single dose of streptozotocin. Glycemic levels were measured at the start (time = 0) and end (time = 60) of the experiment and anorectal manometry at the end.
resultsDM rats presented a significant increase in glycemia at day 60 (DM = 407.14 +/- 73.76) as compared to the control group (time 0 = 175.7 +/- 18.62 and time 60 = 198.04 +/- 28.66). Anorectal manometry showed a significant decrease in anal pressure in the DM group at day 60 (DM = 34.2 +/- 4.97) as compared to the CO group at the same time (CO = 67.4 +/- 2.06), with P < 0.01 and P < 0.001 (Student's t test).
conclusionsThe results suggest that DM, due to the high glycemic levels, lead to alterations such as anal sphincter hypotony, which may cause complications such as fecal incontinence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19547989What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.