Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19547754›Full record

ArticlePloS one2009

Long-term potentiation in isolated dendritic spines.

Amadou T Corera, Guy Doucet, Edward A Fon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecular Characterization of AMPA-Receptor-Containing Vesicles.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pharmacological Rescue of Long-Term Potentiation in Alzheimer Diseased Synapses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Synapse-specific IL-1 receptor subunit reconfiguration augments vulnerability to IL-1β in the aged hippocampus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amadou T CoreraCentre for Neuronal Survival and Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Guy Doucet
Edward A Fon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn brain, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor (NMDAR) activation can induce long-lasting changes in synaptic alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionate (AMPA) receptor (AMPAR) levels. These changes are believed to underlie the expression of several forms of synaptic plasticity, including long-term potentiation (LTP). Such plasticity is generally believed to reflect the regulated trafficking of AMPARs within dendritic spines. However, recent work suggests that the movement of molecules and organelles between the spine and the adjacent dendritic shaft can critically influence synaptic plasticity. To determine whether such movement is strictly required for plasticity, we have developed a novel system to examine AMPAR trafficking in brain synaptosomes, consisting of isolated and apposed pre- and postsynaptic elements. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe report here that synaptosomes can undergo LTP-like plasticity in response to stimuli that mimic synaptic NMDAR activation. Indeed, KCl-evoked release of endogenous glutamate from presynaptic terminals, in the presence of the NMDAR co-agonist glycine, leads to a long-lasting increase in surface AMPAR levels, as measured by [(3)H]-AMPA binding; the increase is prevented by an NMDAR antagonist 2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP5). Importantly, we observe an increase in the levels of GluR1 and GluR2 AMPAR subunits in the postsynaptic density (PSD) fraction, without changes in total AMPAR levels, consistent with the trafficking of AMPARs from internal synaptosomal compartments into synaptic sites. This plasticity is reversible, as the application of AMPA after LTP depotentiates synaptosomes. Moreover, depotentiation requires proteasome-dependent protein degradation. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Together, the results indicate that the minimal machinery required for LTP is present and functions locally within isolated dendritic spines.

Indexed as

Long-Term PotentiationAnimalsBrainDendritic SpinesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionModels, BiologicalNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionSynaptosomesProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID19547754
PMCPMC2695539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.