Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19547746›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2009

Self-organization of the Escherichia coli chemotaxis network imaged with super-resolution light microscopy.

Derek Greenfield, Ann L McEvoy, Hari Shroff, Gavin E Crooks, Ned S Wingreen, Eric Betzig, Jan Liphardt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed
43.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed, 337 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Higher-order transient membrane protein structures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Tracing the Chromatin: From 3C to Live-Cell Imaging.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2024
    Review
  7. Memoryless chemotaxis with discrete cues.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Only Chemoreceptor Encoded byMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Derek GreenfieldBiophysics Graduate Group, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Ann L McEvoy
Hari Shroff
Gavin E Crooks
Ned S Wingreen
Eric Betzig
Jan Liphardt
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USJanelia Research Campus · USPrinceton University · US

Funding

Plasmon RulersR01GM077856 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LIPHARDT, JAN T. · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
Modeling Min-protein oscillations in bacteriaR01GM073186 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI WINGREEN, NED S · 2005 to 2008
$1.1M
A feasibility study of genetically encoded fluorescent gold nanoclustersR01GM084716 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI LIPHARDT, JAN T. · 2008 to 2009
$495k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073186NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077856NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084716NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM77856PHS HHS R01 GMO73186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Escherichia coli chemotaxis network is a model system for biological signal processing. In E. coli, transmembrane receptors responsible for signal transduction assemble into large clusters containing several thousand proteins. These sensory clusters have been observed at cell poles and future division sites. Despite extensive study, it remains unclear how chemotaxis clusters form, what controls cluster size and density, and how the cellular location of clusters is robustly maintained in growing and dividing cells. Here, we use photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) to map the cellular locations of three proteins central to bacterial chemotaxis (the Tar receptor, CheY, and CheW) with a precision of 15 nm. We find that cluster sizes are approximately exponentially distributed, with no characteristic cluster size. One-third of Tar receptors are part of smaller lateral clusters and not of the large polar clusters. Analysis of the relative cellular locations of 1.1 million individual proteins (from 326 cells) suggests that clusters form via stochastic self-assembly. The super-resolution PALM maps of E. coli receptors support the notion that stochastic self-assembly can create and maintain approximately periodic structures in biological membranes, without direct cytoskeletal involvement or active transport.

Indexed as

ChemotaxisBacterial ProteinsChemoreceptor CellsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMethyl-Accepting Chemotaxis ProteinsMicroscopyModels, BiologicalReceptors, Cell SurfaceRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSignal TransductionStochastic ProcessesBacterial ProteinsCheW protein, E colicheY protein, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMethyl-Accepting Chemotaxis ProteinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTar protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID19547746
PMCPMC2691949
OpenAlexW3023958910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.