Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19545950›Full record

ArticlePsychoneuroendocrinology2009

Corepressors, nuclear receptors, and epigenetic factors on DNA: a tail of repression.

Anthony P Auger, Heather M Jessen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Epigenetic mechanisms in sexual differentiation of the brain and behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Epigenetic approaches to psychiatric disorders.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anthony P AugerPsychology Department, 1202 West Johnson Street, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA. apauger@wisc.edu
Heather M Jessen
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Steroid Receptors and Brain Sex DifferencesR01MH072956 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AUGER, ANTHONY P · 2006 to 2010
$1.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH072956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The differential exposure to circulating steroid hormones during brain development can have lasting consequences on brain function and behavior; therefore, the tight control of steroid hormone action within the developing brain is necessary for the expression of appropriate sex-typical behavior patterns later in life. The restricted control of steroid hormone action at the level of the DNA can be accomplished through the recruitment of coregulatory complexes. Nuclear receptor action can either be enhanced by the recruitment of coactivator complexes or suppressed by the formation of corepressor complexes. Alternatively, the regulation of nuclear receptor-mediated gene transcription in the developing brain may involve a dynamic process of coactivator and corepressor function on DNA. It is likely that understanding how different combinations of coregulatory matrixes assembly on DNA will lead to further understanding of heterogeneous responses to nuclear receptor activation. We will discuss how coregulators influence gene transcription and repression, the role of chromatin-binding factors in the regulation of gene transcription, and their potential impact on brain development.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalBrainCo-Repressor ProteinsDNAEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalModels, GeneticReceptors, SteroidSex DifferentiationCo-Repressor ProteinsDNAReceptors, Steroid

Identifiers

PMID19545950
PMCPMC3133443
OpenAlexW2077345143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.