Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19545629›Full record

ReviewMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2009

Copy number variants (CNVs) in primate species using array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Omer Gökçümen, Charles Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Regulatory element copy number differences shape primate expression profiles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Annotating non-coding regions of the genome.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2010
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Omer GökçümenCytogenetics Research Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, EBRC 404, Boston, MA 02115, USA. ogokcumen@partners.org
Charles Lee

Funding

Copy number variation in the human genomeP41HG004221 · NHGRI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LEE, CHARLES · 2007 to 2010
$5.4M
Characterization and Evolution of Copy Number Variation Among PrimatesR01GM081533 · NIGMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LEE, CHARLES · 2008 to 2011
$1.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG004221NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A substantial amount of genomic variation is now known to exist in humans and other primate species. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are thought to represent the vast majority of genomic differences among individuals in a given primate species and comprise about 0.1% of the genomes of two humans. However, recent studies have now shown that structural variation msay account for as much as 0.7% of the genomic differences in humans, of which copy number variants (CNVs) are the largest component. CNVs are segments of DNA that can range in size from hundreds of bases to millions of base pairs in length and have different number of copies between individuals. Recent technological advancements in array technologies led to genome-wide identification of CNVs and consequently revealed thousands of variable loci in humans, comprising as much as 12% of the human genome [A.J. Iafrate, L. Feuk, M.N. Rivera, M.L. Listewnik, P.K. Donahoe, Y. Qi, S.W. Scherer, C. Lee, Nat. Genet. 36 (2004) 949-951, [3]]. CNVs in humans have already been associated with susceptibility to certain complex diseases, dietary adaptation, and several neurological conditions. In addition, recent studies have shown that CNVs can be successfully implemented in population genetics research, providing important insights into human genetic variation. Nevertheless, the important role of CNVs in primate evolution and genetic diversity is still largely unknown. This article aims to outline the strengths and weaknesses of current comparative genomic hybridization array technologies that have been employed to detect CNV variation and the applications of these techniques to primate genetic research.

Indexed as

Comparative Genomic HybridizationGenetic VariationAnimalsGene DuplicationHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPrimates

Identifiers

PMID19545629
PMCPMC2796453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.