ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1991
Comparison of immunisation rates in general practice and child health clinics.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of the media on the decision of parents in South Wales to accept measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) immunization.Epidemiology and infection · 2015Article
- Overcoming barriers to hepatitis B immunisation by a dedicated hepatitis B immunisation service.Archives of disease in childhood · 2001Article
- Do practice-based preventive child health services affect the use of hospitals? A cross-sectional study of hospital use by children in east London.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2000Article
- A retrospective cohort study of risk factors for missing preschool booster immunisation.Archives of disease in childhood · 1998Article
- Reform of well-baby services.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 1997Article
- Effect of practice and patient population characteristics on the uptake of childhood immunizations.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1995Article
- What is interface audit?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 1994Article
- Factors affecting uptake of measles, mumps, and rubella immunisation.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1993Article
- Primary immunisations in Liverpool. II: Is there a gap between consent and completion?Archives of disease in childhood · 1993Article
- Primary immunisations in Liverpool. I: Who withholds consent?Archives of disease in childhood · 1993Article
- Primary and preschool immunisation in Grampian: progress and the 1990 contract.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1992Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare immunisation uptake rates in general practice surgeries and community child health clinics.
designCohort study using data from a computerised child health system.
settingFour health districts of North East Thames Regional Health Authority. SUBJECTS: 3616 children born January to March 1990 and resident in the four districts at the end of January 1991.
main outcome measuresImmunisation uptake rates at 10-12 months of age, age at immunisation, scheduling performance at the two locations, and odds ratios of outstanding immunisations.
results80% of children registered at general practices had completed their third dose of pertussis immunisation compared with 68% of those at health clinics. Median ages at the third dose were 24 weeks and 29 weeks at the two locations respectively. Scheduling was more effective at general practice surgeries. Unscheduled immunisations were more likely to be given after the recommended age. Overall, children resident in rural and suburban areas had greater uptakes than those in inner cities. Odds ratios for not being fully immunised among children registered at health clinics were 1.4 times those among children immunised in general practice and 3.0 times greater among children resident in inner cities than among those in rural and suburban districts. Children who moved into a district, however, were no less likely to be fully immunised than children who were born there.
conclusionsThe immunisation uptake rate was better in general practices than in child health clinics in both inner city and rural and suburban areas. Uptake may be increased with additional support to enable general practitioners to undertake immunisations, especially in inner cities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.