Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19544067›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2009

Relationships between surface EMG variables and motor unit firing rates.

Anita Christie, J Greig Inglis, Gary Kamen, David A Gabriel

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anita ChristieDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
J Greig Inglis
Gary Kamen
David A Gabriel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although surface electromyography (sEMG) is a widely used electrophysiological technique, its physiological interpretation remains somewhat controversial. This study examined the relationship between motor unit firing rates (MUFR) and the root mean square (RMS) amplitude and mean power frequency (MPF) of the sEMG signal in the biceps brachii. Eleven subjects performed maximal isometric elbow flexion while indwelling and sEMG recordings were obtained from the biceps. The RMS amplitude and MPF of the surface signal, and the mean MUFR from the indwelling signal, were calculated over 500 ms epochs. Group means showed a strong MUFR-RMS amplitude relationship (r (2) = 0.91), but a weak MUFR-MPF relationship (r (2) = 0.20). Using all trials, the MUFR-RMS amplitude (r (2) = 0.19) and MUFR-MPF (r (2) = 0.0037) relationships were much weaker. Within individual subjects, the MUFR-RMS amplitude (mean r (2) = 0.13 +/- 0.17) and the MUFR-MPF (mean r (2) = 0.040 +/- 0.041) relationships were also weak. These results suggest that MUFR cannot be predicted from the characteristics of the sEMG signal.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAdultArmElbowElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalRange of Motion, ArticularSurface PropertiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.