Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19543385›Full record

ArticlePloS one2009

Preclinical evaluation of a replication-deficient intranasal DeltaNS1 H5N1 influenza vaccine.

Julia Romanova, Brigitte M Krenn, Markus Wolschek, Boris Ferko, Ekaterina Romanovskaja-Romanko, Alexander Morokutti, Anna-Polina Shurygina, Sabine Nakowitsch, Tanja Ruthsatz, Bettina Kiefmann and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Peptide-Based Vaccines for Tuberculosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Julia RomanovaAvir Green Hills Biotechnology AG, Vienna, Austria.
Brigitte M Krenn
Markus Wolschek
Boris Ferko
Ekaterina Romanovskaja-Romanko
Alexander Morokutti
Anna-Polina Shurygina
Sabine Nakowitsch
Tanja Ruthsatz
Bettina Kiefmann
Ulrich König
Michael Bergmann
Monika Sachet
Shobana Balasingam
Alexander Mann
John Oxford
Martin Slais
Oleg Kiselev
Thomas Muster
Andrej Egorov

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe developed a novel intranasal influenza vaccine approach that is based on the construction of replication-deficient vaccine viruses that lack the entire NS1 gene (DeltaNS1 virus). We previously showed that these viruses undergo abortive replication in the respiratory tract of animals. The local release of type I interferons and other cytokines and chemokines in the upper respiratory tract may have a "self-adjuvant effect", in turn increasing vaccine immunogenicity. As a result, DeltaNS1 viruses elicit strong B- and T- cell mediated immune responses. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe applied this technology to the development of a pandemic H5N1 vaccine candidate. The vaccine virus was constructed by reverse genetics in Vero cells, as a 5:3 reassortant, encoding four proteins HA, NA, M1, and M2 of the A/Vietnam/1203/04 virus while the remaining genes were derived from IVR-116. The HA cleavage site was modified in a trypsin dependent manner, serving as the second attenuation factor in addition to the deleted NS1 gene. The vaccine candidate was able to grow in the Vero cells that were cultivated in a serum free medium to titers exceeding 8 log(10) TCID(50)/ml. The vaccine virus was replication deficient in interferon competent cells and did not lead to viral shedding in the vaccinated animals. The studies performed in three animal models confirmed the safety and immunogenicity of the vaccine. Intranasal immunization protected ferrets and mice from being infected with influenza H5 viruses of different clades. In a primate model (Macaca mulatta), one dose of vaccine delivered intranasally was sufficient for the induction of antibodies against homologous A/Vietnam/1203/04 and heterologous A/Indonesia/5/05 H5N1 strains. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings show that intranasal immunization with the replication deficient H5N1 DeltaNS1 vaccine candidate is sufficient to induce a protective immune response against H5N1 viruses. This approach might be attractive as an alternative to conventional influenza vaccines. Clinical evaluation of DeltaNS1 pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccine candidates are currently in progress.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAnimalsBronchiCell LineChickensChlorocebus aethiopsDogsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEpithelial CellsFerretsHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusHumansInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInfluenza VaccinesMacrophagesMiceHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID19543385
PMCPMC2694350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.