ArticlePLoS computational biology2009
Identification of yeast transcriptional regulation networks using multivariate random forests.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- A DNABERT based deep learning framework for predicting transcription factor binding sites.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Deep Learning Framework with Multi-perspective Feature Fusion for Transcription Factor Binding Site Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026Article
- BERT-TFBS: a novel BERT-based model for predicting transcription factor binding sites by transfer learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- A holistic miRNA-mRNA module discovery.Non-coding RNA research · 2021Article
- MOCCA: a flexible suite for modelling DNA sequence motif occurrence combinatorics.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- DeepGRN: prediction of transcription factor binding site across cell-types using attention-based deep neural networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Machine learning for modeling animal movement.PloS one · 2020Article
- Intervention in prediction measure: a new approach to assessing variable importance for random forests.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Random forests on Hadoop for genome-wide association studies of multivariate neuroimaging phenotypes.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- On a fundamental structure of gene networks in living cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012Article
- Transcriptional signatures of regulatory and toxic responses to benzo-[a]-pyrene exposure.BMC genomics · 2011Article
- Identification of microRNA-mRNA modules using microarray data.BMC genomics · 2011Article
- Article
- Computational methods for analyzing dynamic regulatory networks.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent availability of whole-genome scale data sets that investigate complementary and diverse aspects of transcriptional regulation has spawned an increased need for new and effective computational approaches to analyze and integrate these large scale assays. Here, we propose a novel algorithm, based on random forest methodology, to relate gene expression (as derived from expression microarrays) to sequence features residing in gene promoters (as derived from DNA motif data) and transcription factor binding to gene promoters (as derived from tiling microarrays). We extend the random forest approach to model a multivariate response as represented, for example, by time-course gene expression measures. An analysis of the multivariate random forest output reveals complex regulatory networks, which consist of cohesive, condition-dependent regulatory cliques. Each regulatory clique features homogeneous gene expression profiles and common motifs or synergistic motif groups. We apply our method to several yeast physiological processes: cell cycle, sporulation, and various stress conditions. Our technique displays excellent performance with regard to identifying known regulatory motifs, including high order interactions. In addition, we present evidence of the existence of an alternative MCB-binding pathway, which we confirm using data from two independent cell cycle studies and two other physioloigical processes. Finally, we have uncovered elaborate transcription regulation refinement mechanisms involving PAC and mRRPE motifs that govern essential rRNA processing. These include intriguing instances of differing motif dosages and differing combinatorial motif control that promote regulatory specificity in rRNA metabolism under differing physiological processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.