Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19543368›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2009

Disease-causing 7.4 kb cis-regulatory deletion disrupting conserved non-coding sequences and their interaction with the FOXL2 promotor: implications for mutation screening.

Barbara D'haene, Catia Attanasio, Diane Beysen, Josée Dostie, Edmond Lemire, Philippe Bouchard, Michael Field, Kristie Jones, Birgit Lorenz, Björn Menten and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Isolated A1-domainResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The complexity of epigenetic diseases.The Journal of pathology · 2016
    Review
  11. Long-Range Chromatin Interactions.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Reference-assisted chromosome assembly.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Barbara D'haeneCenter for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Catia Attanasio
Diane Beysen
Josée Dostie
Edmond Lemire
Philippe Bouchard
Michael Field
Kristie Jones
Birgit Lorenz
Björn Menten
Karen Buysse
Filip Pattyn
Marc Friedli
Catherine Ucla
Colette Rossier
Carine Wyss
Frank Speleman
Anne De Paepe
Job Dekker
Stylianos E Antonarakis
Elfride De Baere
Ghent University Hospital · BEUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USChildren's Hospital at Westmead · AUHôpital Saint-Antoine · FRRoyal North Shore Hospital · AURoyal University Hospital · CAUniversity of Giessen · DE

Funding

Structural Annotation of the Human GenomeR01HG003143 · NHGRI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI Job Dekker · 2003 to 2026
$15.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG003143NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, the contribution of disrupted potentially cis-regulatory conserved non-coding sequences (CNCs) to human disease is most likely underestimated, as no systematic screens for putative deleterious variations in CNCs have been conducted. As a model for monogenic disease we studied the involvement of genetic changes of CNCs in the cis-regulatory domain of FOXL2 in blepharophimosis syndrome (BPES). Fifty-seven molecularly unsolved BPES patients underwent high-resolution copy number screening and targeted sequencing of CNCs. Apart from three larger distant deletions, a de novo deletion as small as 7.4 kb was found at 283 kb 5' to FOXL2. The deletion appeared to be triggered by an H-DNA-induced double-stranded break (DSB). In addition, it disrupts a novel long non-coding RNA (ncRNA) PISRT1 and 8 CNCs. The regulatory potential of the deleted CNCs was substantiated by in vitro luciferase assays. Interestingly, Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C) of a 625 kb region surrounding FOXL2 in expressing cellular systems revealed physical interactions of three upstream fragments and the FOXL2 core promoter. Importantly, one of these contains the 7.4 kb deleted fragment. Overall, this study revealed the smallest distant deletion causing monogenic disease and impacts upon the concept of mutation screening in human disease and developmental disorders in particular.

Indexed as

5' Untranslated RegionsPromoter Regions, GeneticRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSequence DeletionBlepharophimosisCell LineConserved SequenceDNA Mutational AnalysisForkhead Box Protein L2Forkhead Transcription FactorsHumansProtein Binding5' Untranslated RegionsForkhead Box Protein L2Forkhead Transcription FactorsFOXL2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID19543368
PMCPMC2689649
OpenAlexW2031486396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.