Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19543366›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2009

A network of conserved damage survival pathways revealed by a genomic RNAi screen.

Dashnamoorthy Ravi, Amy M Wiles, Selvaraj Bhavani, Jianhua Ruan, Philip Leder, Alexander J R Bishop

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. AnOpen biology · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dashnamoorthy RaviGreehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Amy M Wiles
Selvaraj Bhavani
Jianhua Ruan
Philip Leder
Alexander J R Bishop
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USHarvard University · USHarvard University Press · USThe University of Texas at San Antonio · US

Funding

TISSUE CULTURE---COREP30CA054174 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Lei Zheng · 1991 to 2026
$59.1M
New collections of dsRNAs and overexpression miRNA constructs to supplement RNAiR01GM067761 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI PERRIMON, NORBERT · 2003 to 2019
$15.5M
Computational Discovery and Analysis of Community Structures in Biology NetworksSC3GM086305 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI RUAN, JIANHUA · 2009 to 2012
$555k
A screen for damage response genes using recombinationK22ES012264 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI BISHOP, ALEXANDER JAMES · 2004 to 2006
$321k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA054174NIEHS NIH HHS K22 ES012264NIEHS NIH HHS K22-ES12264NIGMS NIH HHS 1 SC3 GM086305-01NIGMS NIH HHS 2 R01-GM067761-05NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067761NIGMS NIH HHS SC3 GM086305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Damage initiates a pleiotropic cellular response aimed at cellular survival when appropriate. To identify genes required for damage survival, we used a cell-based RNAi screen against the Drosophila genome and the alkylating agent methyl methanesulphonate (MMS). Similar studies performed in other model organisms report that damage response may involve pleiotropic cellular processes other than the central DNA repair components, yet an intuitive systems level view of the cellular components required for damage survival, their interrelationship, and contextual importance has been lacking. Further, by comparing data from different model organisms, identification of conserved and presumably core survival components should be forthcoming. We identified 307 genes, representing 13 signaling, metabolic, or enzymatic pathways, affecting cellular survival of MMS-induced damage. As expected, the majority of these pathways are involved in DNA repair; however, several pathways with more diverse biological functions were also identified, including the TOR pathway, transcription, translation, proteasome, glutathione synthesis, ATP synthesis, and Notch signaling, and these were equally important in damage survival. Comparison with genomic screen data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed no overlap enrichment of individual genes between the species, but a conservation of the pathways. To demonstrate the functional conservation of pathways, five were tested in Drosophila and mouse cells, with each pathway responding to alkylation damage in both species. Using the protein interactome, a significant level of connectivity was observed between Drosophila MMS survival proteins, suggesting a higher order relationship. This connectivity was dramatically improved by incorporating the components of the 13 identified pathways within the network. Grouping proteins into "pathway nodes" qualitatively improved the interactome organization, revealing a highly organized "MMS survival network." We conclude that identification of pathways can facilitate comparative biology analysis when direct gene/orthologue comparisons fail. A biologically intuitive, highly interconnected MMS survival network was revealed after we incorporated pathway data in our interactome analysis.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksRNA InterferenceSignal TransductionAnimalsCell LineCells, CulturedDNA DamageDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGenome, InsectMethyl MethanesulfonateMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMutagensSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDrosophila ProteinsMethyl MethanesulfonateMutagens

Identifiers

PMID19543366
PMCPMC2688755
OpenAlexW2100614765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.