ArticleAJR. American journal of roentgenology2009
Low-risk patients with chest pain in the emergency department: negative 64-MDCT coronary angiography may reduce length of stay and hospital charges.
Article in AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00855231 (Diagnostic Accuracy of Multislice CT Angiography for Acute Chest Pain - Assessment of Chest Pain Utilizing a Triple Rule Out Evaluation With Computed Tomography), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diagnostic Accuracy of Multislice CT Angiography for Acute Chest Pain - Assessment of Chest Pain Utilizing a Triple Rule Out Evaluation With Computed Tomography (ACUTE CT) Trial
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Korean guidelines for the appropriate use of cardiac CT.Korean journal of radiologyGuideline
- Article
- Short-Term Outcome of Discharged Low-Risk Chest Pain without Provoke Ischemia Study.Emergency (Tehran, Iran) · 2014Article
- Diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcomes of ECG-gated, whole chest CT in the emergency department.PloS one · 2013Article
- Coronary CT and the coronary calcium score, the future of ED risk stratification?Current cardiology reviews · 2012Review
- Assessment of acute chest pain in the emergency department: Evaluation of the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) trial and its future implications.Current cardiology reports · 2011Article
- The potential role for the use of cardiac computed tomography angiography for the acute chest pain patient in the emergency department: a cautionary viewpoint.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2011Article
- The potential role for the use of cardiac computed tomography angiography for the acute chest pain patient in the emergency department.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2011Article
- A Heart Rate-Dependent Protocol of "One-Stop" Computed Tomography Angiography of Coronary Combined with Pulmonary Arteries Reduces the Dosages of Contrast Agent.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe current standard-of-care workup of low-risk patients with chest pain in an emergency department takes 12-36 hours and is expensive. We hypothesized that negative 64-MDCT coronary angiography early in the workup of such patients may enable a shorter length of stay and reduce charges. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe standard-of-care evaluation consisted of serial cardiac enzyme tests, ECGs, and stress testing. After informed consent, we added cardiac CT early in the standard-of-care workup of 53 consecutive patients. Fifty patients had negative CT findings and were included in this series. The length of stay and charges were analyzed using actual patient data for all patients in the standard-of-care workup and for two earlier discharge scenarios based on negative cardiac CT results: First, CT plus serial enzyme tests and ECGs during an observation period followed by discharge if all were negative; and second, CT plus one set of enzyme tests and one ECG followed by discharge if all were negative. Comparisons were made using paired Student's t tests.
resultsFor standard of care and the two CT-based earlier discharge analyses, the mean lengths of stay were 25.4, 14.3, and 5.0 hours; mean charges were $7,597, $6,153, and $4,251. Length of stay and charges were both significantly less (p < 0.001) for the two CT-based analyses.
conclusionIn low-risk patients with chest pain, discharge from the emergency department based on negative cardiac CT, enzyme tests, and ECG may significantly decrease both length of stay and hospital charges compared with the standard of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.