Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19542407›Full record

ArticleAJR. American journal of roentgenology2009

Low-risk patients with chest pain in the emergency department: negative 64-MDCT coronary angiography may reduce length of stay and hospital charges.

Janet M May, William P Shuman, Jared N Strote, Kelley R Branch, Lee M Mitsumori, David W Lockhart, James H Caldwell

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00855231 (Diagnostic Accuracy of Multislice CT Angiography for Acute Chest Pain - Assessment of Chest Pain Utilizing a Triple Rule Out Evaluation With Computed Tomography), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00855231 completednot on this map

Diagnostic Accuracy of Multislice CT Angiography for Acute Chest Pain - Assessment of Chest Pain Utilizing a Triple Rule Out Evaluation With Computed Tomography (ACUTE CT) Trial

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2006 to 2009Enrolled102ConditionsChest Pain, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Pulmonary Embolism, Aortic Dissection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The potential role for the use of cardiac computed tomography angiography for the acute chest pain patient in the emergency department: a cautionary viewpoint.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2011
    Article
  8. The potential role for the use of cardiac computed tomography angiography for the acute chest pain patient in the emergency department.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2011
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Janet M MayDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific St., RR210, Box 357115, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. jbonny@u.washington.edu
William P Shuman
Jared N Strote
Kelley R Branch
Lee M Mitsumori
David W Lockhart
James H Caldwell

Funding

Institute of Translational Health SciencesUL1TR000423 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$49.4M
Institute for Translational Health Science (KL2)KL2RR025015 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2007 to 2011
$9.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000423NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR025015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe current standard-of-care workup of low-risk patients with chest pain in an emergency department takes 12-36 hours and is expensive. We hypothesized that negative 64-MDCT coronary angiography early in the workup of such patients may enable a shorter length of stay and reduce charges. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe standard-of-care evaluation consisted of serial cardiac enzyme tests, ECGs, and stress testing. After informed consent, we added cardiac CT early in the standard-of-care workup of 53 consecutive patients. Fifty patients had negative CT findings and were included in this series. The length of stay and charges were analyzed using actual patient data for all patients in the standard-of-care workup and for two earlier discharge scenarios based on negative cardiac CT results: First, CT plus serial enzyme tests and ECGs during an observation period followed by discharge if all were negative; and second, CT plus one set of enzyme tests and one ECG followed by discharge if all were negative. Comparisons were made using paired Student's t tests.

resultsFor standard of care and the two CT-based earlier discharge analyses, the mean lengths of stay were 25.4, 14.3, and 5.0 hours; mean charges were $7,597, $6,153, and $4,251. Length of stay and charges were both significantly less (p < 0.001) for the two CT-based analyses.

conclusionIn low-risk patients with chest pain, discharge from the emergency department based on negative cardiac CT, enzyme tests, and ECG may significantly decrease both length of stay and hospital charges compared with the standard of care.

Indexed as

Chest PainCoronary AngiographyEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentTomography, X-Ray ComputedWashington

Identifiers

PMID19542407
PMCPMC3743664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.