Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19541929›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology2009

Modulation of the E2F1-driven cancer cell fate by the DNA damage response machinery and potential novel E2F1 targets in osteosarcomas.

Michalis Liontos, Katerina Niforou, Georgia Velimezi, Konstantinos Vougas, Konstantinos Evangelou, Kalliopi Apostolopoulou, Radek Vrtel, Alexandros Damalas, Panayiotis Kontovazenitis, Athanassios Kotsinas and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. E2F1: Cause and Consequence of DNA Replication Stress.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Melatonin: an anti-tumor agent for osteosarcoma.Cancer cell international · 2019
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Steroid receptor co-activator-3 promotes osteosarcoma progression through up-regulation of FoxM1.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Michalis LiontosDepartment of Histology and Embryology, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Katerina Niforou
Georgia Velimezi
Konstantinos Vougas
Konstantinos Evangelou
Kalliopi Apostolopoulou
Radek Vrtel
Alexandros Damalas
Panayiotis Kontovazenitis
Athanassios Kotsinas
Vassilis Zoumpourlis
George Th Tsangaris
Christos Kittas
Doron Ginsberg
Thanos D Halazonetis
Jiri Bartek
Vassilis G Gorgoulis
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRBiomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens · GRDanish Cancer Society · DKBar-Ilan University · ILNational Hellenic Research Foundation · GRUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Ioannina · GR

Funding

Activation of checkpoint pathways in cancerR01CA118827 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA · PI HALAZONETIS, THANOS D · 2006 to 2009
$750k
NCI NIH HHS CA118827NCI NIH HHS R01 CA118827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone cancer. Mutations of the RB gene represent the most frequent molecular defect in this malignancy. A major consequence of this alteration is that the activity of the key cell cycle regulator E2F1 is unleashed from the inhibitory effects of pRb. Studies in animal models and in human cancers have shown that deregulated E2F1 overexpression possesses either "oncogenic" or "oncosuppressor" properties, depending on the cellular context. To address this issue in osteosarcomas, we examined the status of E2F1 relative to cell proliferation and apoptosis in a clinical setting of human primary osteosarcomas and in E2F1-inducible osteosarcoma cell line models that are wild-type and deficient for p53. Collectively, our data demonstrated that high E2F1 levels exerted a growth-suppressing effect that relied on the integrity of the DNA damage response network. Surprisingly, induction of p73, an established E2F1 target, was also DNA damage response-dependent. Furthermore, a global proteome analysis associated with bioinformatics revealed novel E2F1-regulated genes and potential E2F1-driven signaling networks that could provide useful targets in challenging this aggressive neoplasm by innovative therapies.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overApoptosisBlotting, WesternBone NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationChildDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDNA RepairE2F1 Transcription FactorElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalDNA-Binding ProteinsE2F1 protein, humanE2F1 Transcription FactorNuclear ProteinsTP73 protein, humanTumor Protein p73Tumor Suppressor Protein p53Tumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19541929
PMCPMC2708823
OpenAlexW2001649025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.