Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19540940›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta2010

Mechanism and evolution of DNA primases.

Robert D Kuchta, Gudrun Stengel

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ADAR1 is an editor of DNA replication forks.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mouse PrimPol Outperforms Its Human Counterpart as a Robust DNA Primase.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. How bacteria initiate DNA replication comes into focus.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert D KuchtaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA. Kuchta@colorado.edu
Gudrun Stengel
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Mechanism of Herpes DNA ReplicationR01AI059764 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI KUCHTA, ROBERT D · 2005 to 2014
$2.4M
MECHANISM OF DNA POLYMERASE ALPHA-PRIMASER01GM054194 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI KUCHTA, ROBERT D · 1996 to 2009
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS AI59764NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI059764NIGMS NIH HHS GM54194NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA primase synthesizes short RNA primers that replicative polymerases further elongate in order to initiate the synthesis of all new DNA strands. Thus, primase owes its existence to the inability of DNA polymerases to initiate DNA synthesis starting with 2 dNTPs. Here, we discuss the evolutionary relationships between the different families of primases (viral, eubacterial, archael, and eukaryotic) and the catalytic mechanisms of these enzymes. This includes how they choose an initiation site, elongate the growing primer, and then only synthesize primers of defined length via an inherent ability to count. Finally, the low fidelity of primases along with the development of primase inhibitors is described.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsDNA PrimaseDNA PrimersHumansMolecular Sequence DataSequence Homology, Amino AcidDNA PrimaseDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID19540940
PMCPMC2846230
OpenAlexW2086219095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.