Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19540699›Full record

ArticleJournal of substance abuse treatment2009

Dually diagnosed patients' responses to substance use disorder treatment.

M Tyler Boden, Rudolf Moos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. 'I'm a sick person, not a bad person': patient experiences of treatments for alcohol use disorders.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M Tyler BodenDepartment of Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Center for Health Care Evaluation, Health Services Research and Development Service, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA. mboden@stanford.edu
Rudolf Moos

Funding

A BIOBEHAVIORAL RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32MH019938 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Corey J Keller, RACHEL MANBER · 1994 to 2026
$9.4M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies have investigated whether dually diagnosed patients with co-occurring substance use and psychiatric disorders (DD) respond as well to substance use disorder (SUD) treatments as patients with SUD do. Here we assessed whether male veteran DD and SUD patients with alcohol dependence diagnoses differed in the process and outcomes of residential SUD treatment. The main findings showed that (a) DD patients did not perceive SUD programs as positively as patients with SUD did and had worse proximal outcomes at discharge from treatment; (b) DD patients did as well as SUD patients on 1- and 5-year substance use outcomes but had worse psychiatric outcomes; and (c) patients who perceived treatment more positively and had better outcomes at discharge had better longer term outcomes. Thus, residential SUD programs are relatively effective in reducing DD patients' substance use problems; however, they are less successful in engaging DD patients in treatment and addressing their psychiatric problems.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlcoholismDiagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry)Follow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedResidential TreatmentSubstance-Related DisordersTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVeteransYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID19540699
PMCPMC3292216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.