ArticleBMC medical ethics2009
Technology assessment and resource allocation for predictive genetic testing: a study of the perspectives of Canadian genetic health care providers.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- What is in a Name? Parent, Professional and Policy-Maker Conceptions of Consent-Related Language in the Context of Newborn Screening.Public health ethics · 2019Article
- Healthcare System Priorities for Successful Integration of Genomics: An Australian Focus.Frontiers in public health · 2019Review
- Gene patents still alive and kicking: their impact on provision of genetic testing for long QT syndrome in the Canadian public health-care system.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017Article
- The Impact of Angelina Jolie (AJ)'s Story on Genetic Referral and Testing at an Academic Cancer Centre in Canada.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- Points to consider for prioritizing clinical genetic testing services: a European consensus process oriented at accountability for reasonableness.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2015Article
- The value of personalizing medicine: medical oncologists' views on gene expression profiling in breast cancer treatment.The oncologist · 2015Article
- Stakeholder attitudes towards the role and application of informed consent for newborn bloodspot screening: a study protocol.BMJ open · 2014Article
- Knowledge of genetic testing for hereditary kidney cancer in Canada is lacking: The results of the Canadian national hereditary kidney cancer needs assessment survey.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2014Article
- Access to personalized medicine: factors influencing the use and value of gene expression profiling in breast cancer treatment.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2014Article
- Criteria for fairly allocating scarce health-care resources to genetic tests: which matter most?European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2014Article
- Eliciting preferences for priority setting in genetic testing: a pilot study comparing best-worst scaling and discrete-choice experiments.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2013Article
- Access to genetic testing and genetic counseling in vulnerable populations: the d/Deaf and hard of hearing population.Journal of community genetics · 2011Article
- Personalised medicine in Canada: a survey of adoption and practice in oncology, cardiology and family medicine.BMJ open · 2011Article
- Points to consider in assessing and appraising predictive genetic tests.Journal of community genetics · 2010Article
- Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith a growing number of genetic tests becoming available to the health and consumer markets, genetic health care providers in Canada are faced with the challenge of developing robust decision rules or guidelines to allocate a finite number of public resources. The objective of this study was to gain Canadian genetic health providers' perspectives on factors and criteria that influence and shape resource allocation decisions for publically funded predictive genetic testing in Canada.
methodsThe authors conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 senior lab directors and clinicians at publically funded Canadian predictive genetic testing facilities. Participants were drawn from British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec and Nova Scotia. Given the community sampled was identified as being relatively small and challenging to access, purposive sampling coupled with snowball sampling methodologies were utilized.
resultsSurveyed lab directors and clinicians indicated that predictive genetic tests were funded provincially by one of two predominant funding models, but they themselves played a significant role in how these funds were allocated for specific tests and services. They also rated and identified several factors that influenced allocation decisions and patients' decisions regarding testing. Lastly, participants provided recommendations regarding changes to existing allocation models and showed support for a national evaluation process for predictive testing.
conclusionOur findings suggest that largely local and relatively ad hoc decision making processes are being made in relation to resource allocations for predictive genetic tests and that a more coordinated and, potentially, national approach to allocation decisions in this context may be appropriate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.