Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19538648›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2009

A questionnaire to measure health practitioners' attitudes to partnership in medicine taking: LATCon II.

Peter Knapp, David K Raynor, Jill E Thistlethwaite, Marc B Jones

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Cross-cultural validation of the patient-practitioner orientation scale among primary care professionals in Spain.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Trial
  4. Mixed methods analysis of hospice staff perceptions and shared decision making practices in hospice.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Psychiatric Providers' Willingness to Participate in Shared Decision Making When Prescribing Psychotropics.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Beyond technology acceptance to effective technology use: a parsimonious and actionable model.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
  13. A test of concordance between patient and psychiatrist valuations of multiple treatment goals for schizophrenia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter KnappSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. p.r.knapp@leeds.ac.uk
David K Raynor
Jill E Thistlethwaite
Marc B Jones
University of Leeds · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo revise and improve an existing scale to measure health practitioners' attitudes to partnership in medicine taking and to ascertain the views of medical students, nursing students and pre-registration pharmacists on concordance.

backgroundThe traditional model of the practitioner-patient interaction incorporates a practitioner-centred approach, focusing on the disease rather than the patient. The philosophy of 'concordance' (or 'partnership in medicine-taking') puts the patient at the centre of the interaction, with the patient interacting reciprocally with the practitioner. The Leeds Attitude to Concordance (LATCon) scale was developed in 2001 to assess practitioners' and patients' attitudes to concordance. However, thinking on concordance has developed since then and the present study aimed to revise the scale to ensure that it reflected current thinking and also to increase its reliability and validity.

designA pool of potential items was developed and sent to three subject experts for opinion. An attitudinal Likert scale of 31 items was developed. Its completion was followed by statistical item reduction to 20 items. The shorter scale was completed by the same participants 4-6 weeks later. SETTING AND

participantsThe study was set in a university in the UK. Participants were 183 medical students, nursing students, and pre-registration pharmacists. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The study derived a 20 item scale, including five negatively-worded items, with good levels of internal and test-retest reliability. Factor analysis suggested five main factors. A statistically significant difference in attitudes was found between student nurses and medical students, and student nurses and pre-registration pharmacists, with student nurses being more in agreement with the concordant approach. Overall, participants were in agreement with the concordant approach to medicine taking. The UK National Health Service advocates partnership in medical care and is encouraging both practitioners and patients to work to introduce this. There is increased awareness of the patients' perspective by practitioners, but its impact on their practice remains unclear. Education and skills teaching must continue for the benefits of a concordant approach to be seen. The LATCon scale could play a useful role in education and training, and in research assessing the movement towards the new approach.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDrug TherapyPatient CompliancePatient ParticipationSurveys and QuestionnairesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansStudents, MedicalStudents, NursingStudents, PharmacyUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID19538648
PMCPMC5060481
OpenAlexW1937485283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.