ReviewMolecular diagnosis & therapy2009
Genomic predictors of outcome and treatment response in breast cancer.
Review in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2013Pooled it
- Wenshen Zhuanggu formula effectively suppresses breast cancer bone metastases in a mouse Xenograft model.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2017Article
- Analysis of gene expression profiles as a tool to uncover tumor markers of liver cancer progression in a rat model.Biomedical reports · 2015Article
- Proteomics of ovarian cancer: functional insights and clinical applications.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2015Review
- Candidate luminal B breast cancer genes identified by genome, gene expression and DNA methylation profiling.PloS one · 2014Article
- The metastasis-promoting roles of tumor-associated immune cells.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2013Review
- Integrated genomic analysis of breast cancers.Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG · 2012Article
- Pathological complete response in younger and older breast cancer patients.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2012Article
- The pro-metastatic role of bone marrow-derived cells: a focus on MSCs and regulatory T cells.EMBO reports · 2012Review
- A tale of mice and (wo)men: development of and insights from an "all human" animal model of breast cancer metastasis to bone.Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association · 2012Article
- Human bone marrow-derived MSCs can home to orthotopic breast cancer tumors and promote bone metastasis.Cancer research · 2010Article
- Proteomics as a guiding tool for more effective personalized therapy.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2010Review
- Proteomics and ovarian cancer: integrating proteomics information into clinical care.Journal of proteomics · 2010Review
- HER2/neu protein expression and fine needle breast aspiration from Argentinean patients with non-palpable breast lesions.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2010Article
- Renal cell carcinoma: where will the state-of-the-art lead us?Current oncology reports · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advances in breast cancer treatment and outcome over the last two decades, women continue to relapse and die of advanced disease. Historically, estrogen and progesterone receptor expression, HER2 overexpression and clinico-pathologic parameters have guided therapeutic decision making. However, there are limits to the risk estimation provided by these parameters, leading to potential overtreatment of low-risk disease and undertreatment of poor-risk disease. Genomic technologies now provide the opportunity to refine our therapeutic approach by individualizing treatment to patients' individual tumor profiles. Gene profiles or signatures are groupings of genes that are differentially expressed between tumors, reflecting differences in biologic behavior. Prognostic gene signatures stratify breast cancer patients by tumor natural history, regardless of the treatment employed. Currently, there are three commercially available prognostic gene signatures: Oncotype DX (Genomic Health, Inc.), MammaPrint (Agendia BV), and the HOXB13/IL17BR (H/I) ratio; (Theros H/ISM; bioTheranostics). Others under development include the Intrinsic Gene Set, the Rotterdam Signature, the Wound Response Indicator, and the Invasive Gene Signature. Predicative signatures classify patients based on responsiveness to specific therapies. Of the prognostic signatures, Oncotype DX has been shown to have predictive value for the incremental benefit of chemotherapy when added to a hormonal therapy regimen. Additional genetic profiles under development predict response to specific hormonal therapies, anthracyclines, and taxanes. Gene signatures have the potential to transform breast cancer treatment as it becomes tailored to each patient's tumor expression profile and significantly improve the outcomes of this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19537843What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.