Trial reportDrugs2009
Efficacy and safety of nebulized formoterol as add-on therapy in COPD patients receiving maintenance tiotropium bromide: Results from a 6-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.
Trial report in Drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00507234 (A 6-Week Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Concomitant Treatment With Formoterol Fumarate Inhalation Solution 20 Mcg Twice Daily and Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily to Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily Alone in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A 6-Week Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Concomitant Treatment With Formoterol Fumarate Inhalation Solution 20 Mcg Twice Daily and Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily to Tiotropium 18 Mcg Once Daily Alone in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ibuprofen versus fosfomycin for uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women: randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2015Trial
- A blinded evaluation of the efficacy and safety of glycopyrronium, a once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonist, versus tiotropium, in patients with COPD: the GLOW5 study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2014Trial
- When is dual bronchodilation indicated in COPD?International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2017Review
- Dual bronchodilation in COPD: lung function and patient-reported outcomes - a review.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2017Review
- A review of nebulized drug delivery in COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2016Review
- New combination bronchodilators for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current evidence and future perspectives.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Review
- Aclidinium bromide/formoterol fixed-dose combination therapy for COPD: the evidence to date.Drug design, development and therapy · 2015Review
- Combination bronchodilator therapy in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Respiratory research · 2013Review
- No room to breathe: the importance of lung hyperinflation in COPD.Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group · 2013Review
- Ten years of tiotropium: clinical impact and patient perspectives.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2013Review
- Beyond lung function in COPD management: effectiveness of LABA/LAMA combination therapy on patient-centred outcomes.Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group · 2012Review
- Nebulized formoterol: a review of clinical efficacy and safety in COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current guidelines for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recommend the use of long-acting bronchodilators in the maintenance management of COPD. Combining bronchodilators that work through different mechanisms is recommended in patients with continuous symptoms. We conducted this study to confirm and further investigate the efficacy and safety of nebulized formoterol as an add-on therapy to maintenance tiotropium in patients with COPD. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study (NCT00507234) was conducted at 24 US sites from March to October 2007 in 155 patients aged > or =40 years with post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) > or =25% to <65% predicted normal. COPD patients receiving open-label tiotropium bromide 18 microg once daily during a 1- to 2-week run-in period were randomized to receive either formoterol fumarate inhalation solution 20 microg or placebo by nebulization twice daily for 6 weeks while continuing treatment with tiotropium. Outcomes included serial spirometry, inspiratory capacity (IC), baseline dyspnoea index/transition dyspnoea index (BDI/TDI), daily symptom scores, salbutamol (albuterol) use and health status measured by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). The primary efficacy endpoint was standardized absolute FEV(1) area under the curve over 3 hours (AUC(0-3)) at week 6. Treatment groups (formoterol plus tiotropium, n = 78; placebo plus tiotropium, n = 77) were comparable at baseline. At 6 weeks, FEV(1) AUC(0-3) was significantly greater in the formoterol group compared with the placebo group (1.57 vs 1.38 L [p < 0.0001]). Similarly, formoterol plus tiotropium improved other lung function measures, including FEV(1), forced vital capacity and post-dose IC at day 1, and maintained efficacy through week 6. Formoterol plus tiotropium decreased rescue albuterol use throughout the study (p < 0.05). Mean TDI, SGRQ and most symptom scores did not differ between the two treatment groups. Overall, 37% of formoterol plus tiotropium recipients experienced adverse events versus 51% of those receiving placebo plus tiotropium. The addition of nebulized formoterol to tiotropium in maintenance treatment of COPD provided clinically meaningful, statistically significant and sustained improvements in pulmonary function without additional adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.