Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19536808›Full record

ArticleGenesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)2009

Functional dissection of Timekeeper (Tik) implicates opposite roles for CK2 and PP2A during Drosophila neurogenesis.

Ezgi Kunttas-Tatli, Anasua Bose, Bhaskar Kahali, Clifton P Bishop, Ashok P Bidwai

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ezgi Kunttas-TatliDepartment of Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Anasua Bose
Bhaskar Kahali
Clifton P Bishop
Ashok P Bidwai
West Virginia University · US

Funding

Retinal Patterning: A role for protein kinase CK2R01EY015718 · NEI · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI BIDWAI, ASHOK · 2004 to 2009
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS EY015718NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repression by E(spl)M8 during inhibitory Notch (N) signaling (lateral inhibition) is regulated, in part, by protein kinase CK2, but the involvement of a phosphatase has been unclear. The studies we report here employ Tik, a unique dominant-negative (DN) mutation in the catalytic subunit of CK2, in a Gal4-UAS based assay for impaired lateral inhibition. Specifically, overexpression of Tik elicits ectopic bristles in N(+) flies and suppresses the retinal defects of the gain-of-function allele N(spl). Functional dissection of the two substitutions in Tik (M(161)K and E(165)D), suggests that both mutations contribute to its DN effects. While the former replacement compromises CK2 activity by impairing ATP-binding, the latter affects a conserved motif implicated in binding the phosphatase PP2A. Accordingly, overexpression of microtubule star (mts), the PP2A catalytic subunit closely mimics the phenotypic effects of loss of CK2 functions in N(+) or N(spl) flies, and elicits notched wings, a characteristic of N mutations. Our findings suggest antagonistic roles for CK2 and PP2A during inhibitory N signaling.

Indexed as

NeurogenesisAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCasein Kinase IICatalytic DomainDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsHumansModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataProtein Structure, TertiaryReceptors, NotchSequence AlignmentSignal TransductionCasein Kinase IIDrosophila Proteinsmts protein, DrosophilaN protein, DrosophilaReceptors, Notch

Identifiers

PMID19536808
PMCPMC2917814
OpenAlexW2092421554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.