Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19536563›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2009

Octreotide for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Tian-Kang Guo, Xiang-Yong Hao, Bin Ma, Ke-Hu Yang, Yi-Ping Li, Hong-Ling Li, Yuan-Hui Gu, Hui Cai, Ya-Li Liu, Yuan Li and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Somatostatin analogues in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2011
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tian-Kang GuoThe People's Hospital of Gansu Province, Dong Gang West Road No. 160, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, People's Republic of China.
Xiang-Yong Hao
Bin Ma
Ke-Hu Yang
Yi-Ping Li
Hong-Ling Li
Yuan-Hui Gu
Hui Cai
Ya-Li Liu
Yuan Li
Wei-Peng Zhan
Gansu Provincial Hospital · CNLanzhou University · CNGanzhou People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effectiveness of octreotide in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma participants on the basis of randomized controlled trials.

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China Journal Full-text Database, Chinese Scientific Journals Database up to June 2008 in any language. Randomized controlled trials of octreotide for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma were selected and evaluated by two investigators. Any disagreement was solved by discussion. Analyses were performed using Review Manager 4.2.

resultsSix randomized controlled trials totaling 352 participants were included. The median survival time was reported in four randomized controlled trials. The results between the octreotide group and the control group (the placebo or best supportive care group) were as follows: 13.0 versus 4.0 months, 1.93 versus 1.97 months, 4.7 versus 5.3 months, and 7.0 versus 2.5 months. Three randomized controlled trials reported 6-month survival rates and 12-month survival rates and meta-analysis results in these two outcomes [(RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.92-1.97); (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.66-11.16) respectively] were not found to be statistically significant by random-effects model. When we analyzed 6-month survival rates by fixed-effect model (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.02-1.66), meta-analysis result reached statistical significance.

conclusionsAs for the limitations of the included trials, the result may not demonstrate a significant superiority of octreotide administration in participants with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma from the available evidence.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalCarcinoma, HepatocellularDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedOctreotideYoung AdultAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalOctreotide

Identifiers

PMID19536563
PMCPMC11844778
OpenAlexW2096482848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.