Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19536557›Full record

ArticleRadiation and environmental biophysics2009

A new view of radiation-induced cancer: integrating short- and long-term processes. Part I: approach.

Igor Shuryak, Philip Hahnfeldt, Lynn Hlatky, Rainer K Sachs, David J Brenner

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparative Risk Predictions of Second Cancers After Carbon-Ion Therapy Versus Proton Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Igor ShuryakCenter for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA. ishuryak@gmail.com
Philip Hahnfeldt
Lynn Hlatky
Rainer K Sachs
David J Brenner

Funding

THE FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS OF BYSTANDER RESPONSESP01CA049062 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI HEI, TOM K. · 1990 to 2014
$21.9M
TR&D 3P41EB002033 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BRENNER, DAVID JONATHAN · 2003 to 2018
$17.0M
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY/BIOSTATISTICS/ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCEST32CA009529 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI NEUGUT, ALFRED I. · 1985 to 2012
$4.3M
QUANTIFYING EFFECTIVENESS OF ANGIOGENIC INHIBITORSR01CA078496 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI HAHNFELDT, PHILIP · 1998 to 2004
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS 5T32-CA009529NCI NIH HHS CA78496NCI NIH HHS P01 CA049062NCI NIH HHS P01 CA-49062NCI NIH HHS R01 CA078496NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009529NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002033NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002033-09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematical models of radiation carcinogenesis are important for understanding mechanisms and for interpreting or extrapolating risk. There are two classes of such models: (1) long-term formalisms that track pre-malignant cell numbers throughout an entire lifetime but treat initial radiation dose-response simplistically and (2) short-term formalisms that provide a detailed initial dose-response even for complicated radiation protocols, but address its modulation during the subsequent cancer latency period only indirectly. We argue that integrating short- and long-term models is needed. As an example of this novel approach, we integrate a stochastic short-term initiation/inactivation/repopulation model with a deterministic two-stage long-term model. Within this new formalism, the following assumptions are implemented: radiation initiates, promotes, or kills pre-malignant cells; a pre-malignant cell generates a clone, which, if it survives, quickly reaches a size limitation; the clone subsequently grows more slowly and can eventually generate a malignant cell; the carcinogenic potential of pre-malignant cells decreases with age.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionChildDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleHumansKineticsMaleMiddle AgedRiskTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID19536557
PMCPMC2714893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.