Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19536445›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2010

The revolving door phenomenon in psychiatry: comparing low-frequency and high-frequency users of psychiatric inpatient services in a developing country.

Ulla A Botha, Liezl Koen, John A Joska, John S Parker, Neil Horn, Linda M Hering, Piet P Oosthuizen

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Schizoaffective disorder in homeless patients: A systematic review.The International journal of social psychiatry · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Profile of male acute admissions at a state psychiatric hospital in the Western Cape, South Africa.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2026
    Article
  6. Frequent Users in Psychiatric Consultations: A 6-Year Retrospective Study in the Emergency Department.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: Length of stay and associated factors.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Descriptive outcomes for a cohort of high-frequency psychiatric service users in the Western Cape, South Africa after 10 years.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ulla A BothaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Liezl Koen
John A Joska
John S Parker
Neil Horn
Linda M Hering
Piet P Oosthuizen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDeinstitutionalization has led to a dramatic reduction of inpatient beds and subsequent increase in pressure on available beds. Another consequence of deinstitutionalization has been the phenomenon of the revolving door patient; high-frequency users (HFUs) admitted to hospital repeatedly, remaining well for only short periods of time. The purpose of the study was to determine factors that contribute to HFU of inpatient psychiatric services by schizophrenia and schizo-affective disorder subjects in a developing country with a view to understanding this phenomenon better.

methodsSubjects were divided into HFU and low-frequency user (LFUs) groups for comparison with regard to selected variables.

resultsHFUs had higher PANSS scores (p < 0.01), were more likely to admit to lifetime substance use (p = 0.01), be on mood stabilizers (p < 0.01) and also to have been crisis (premature) discharges (p < 0.01). LFUs were more likely to have been treated with depot medication (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed crisis discharge (p = 0.03) and depot use (p = 0.03) to be the only remaining significant predictors of HFU versus LFU status. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest HFUs' characteristics to be similar across different settings, with under-utilization of depot antipsychotics and early discharge from hospital as particular contributors to high-frequency use of services in our sample.

conclusionResults seem to indicate that HFU-specific interventions are vital to addressing these issues.

Indexed as

AdultAlcohol-Related DisordersAntipsychotic AgentsDeinstitutionalizationDelayed-Action PreparationsDeveloping CountriesFemaleHospitalizationHospitals, PsychiatricHumansLength of StayLogistic ModelsMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionAntipsychotic AgentsDelayed-Action Preparations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.