Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19536421›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2009

Health and nutritional promotion program for patients with dementia (NutriAlz Study): design and baseline data.

A Salva, S Andrieu, E Fernandez, E J Schiffrin, J Moulin, B Decarli, Y Guigoz, B Vellas, NutriAlz Group

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mechanisms of the anorexia of aging-a review.Age (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2015
    Review
  13. Anorexia of aging: a true geriatric syndrome.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2012
    Article
  14. Editorial: can we improve care for patients with dementia?The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

A SalvaA. Salva, Institut de l'Envelliment, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, St. Antoni M. Claret 171, 08041 Barcelona, Spain. antoni.salva@uab.es
S Andrieu
E Fernandez
E J Schiffrin
J Moulin
B Decarli
Y Guigoz
B Vellas
NutriAlz Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a lack of data on global weight loss prevention programs for patients with dementia or clear evidence about their impact on a functional level, caregiver burden or the use of healthcare and social resources. NutriAlz is a socio-educative and nutritional intervention program to prevent weight loss and loss of function in dementia patients. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsA cluster randomized multi-centre study, which will allow the comparison of a group benefiting from the intervention with a control group after a year of monitoring. Patients were recruited from 11 hospitals in the ambulatory diagnostic units and day care centres. The baseline interview include: sociodemographic and socioeconomic variables (age, gender, educational level, marital status); diagnostic, treatments, MMS, a list of comorbid conditions; activities of daily living (ADL, IADL), Zarit Scale, brief-NPI, Cornell scale and nutritional status as measured by the Mini Nutritional Assessment. All participants or their family signed the inform consent form. BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS: Total of 946 patients were included, with a mean (+/- SD) of 79 +/- 7.3 year of age; 68,1 % were women; 44,9% lives with their partner, only 3% lives alone; 79.8% had Alzheimer's dementia, 5.25 +/- 3.0 years since symptoms of dementia and 2.8 +/- 2.11 years since diagnosis. Mean MMSE score was 15.4 +/- 6.2; mean weight was 64.4 +/- 12.5 kg; mean BMI was 27.0 +/- 4.5 (with 3% below 19, 5% between 19-21, 10% between 21-23, and 82% above 23). Mean ADL without difficulties was 3.2 +/- 2.1; mean IADL without difficulties was 0.7 +/- 1.6; mean number of symptoms in the NPI was 4.4 +/- 2.59, with severity score of 7.9 +/- 5.9 and distress score of 11.3 +/- 9.0; mean Zarit scale was 27.4 +/- 15.5; mean MNA was 23.2 +/- 3.5 with 5 % as malnourished, 32 % at risk of malnutrition, and 63 % with adequate nutritional status.

Indexed as

Health PromotionPatient Education as TopicActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversDementiaFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMalnutritionNutrition TherapyPrevalenceResearch DesignRisk

Identifiers

PMID19536421
PMCPMC12880266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.