ArticleThe Canadian journal of cardiology2009
A mixed methods study of continuity of care from cardiac rehabilitation to primary care physicians.
Article in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using a Combined Platform of Swarm Intelligence Algorithms and GIS to Provide Land Suitability Maps for Locating Cardiac Rehabilitation Defibrillators.Iranian journal of public health · 2015Article
- Mixed methods in biomedical and health services research.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2013Article
- Primary care provider perceptions of intake transition records and shared care with outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs.BMC health services research · 2011Article
- Cardiac rehabilitation uptake following myocardial infarction: cross-sectional study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010Article
- We can handle this: parents' use of religion in the first year following their child's diagnosis with cystic fibrosis.Journal of health care chaplaincy · 2010Article
- Cardiac rehabilitation and primary care: bridging the two solitudes.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParticipation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs results in multiple beneficial outcomes, including decreased morbidity and mortality. In Canada, the involvement of the primary care physician post-CR should increase the likelihood of sustaining the benefits achieved by CR and enhance the continuity of care that cardiac patients receive.
objectivesTo identify and describe information that is transferred from CR programs to primary care physicians in discharge summaries, and to assess the usefulness of such information from the perspective of the primary care physician.
methodsFor each of 21 Ontario CR sites to which patients from a larger study were referred, up to four primary care physicians were contacted to request a copy of the CR discharge summary received and their participation in a telephone interview. Discharge data were coded and enumerated. Qualitative data from 17 interviews were transcribed and coded based on grounded analyses.
resultsOf the 89 primary care physicians approached, 50 participated (response rate of 61.7%). Twenty-one physicians (42.0%) received the intended discharge summary from the CR site. There was great variability in clinical and service data reported, with 52.0% reporting an exercise prescription for the home or community and 42.0% reporting current medications prescribed. Four themes requiring improvement were generated from the physician interviews: patient behavioural management issues, health system factors, efficiency of data transfer and communication issues.
conclusionsMajor inconsistencies were noted between clinical data communicated versus what was desired. Data relating to attendance rates, behavioural management suggestions and lipid values were among the most notable omissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.