Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19536196›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2009

Making a firm decision: multifaceted regulation of cell fate in the early mouse embryo.

Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz, Samantha A Morris, Alexander W Bruce

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 166 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
166citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

166 citing papers in PubMed, 332 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Identifying Combinatorial Regulatory Genes for Cell Fate Decision via Reparameterizable Subset Explanations.KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

106 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Magdalena Zernicka-GoetzThe Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK. m.zernicka-goetz@
Samantha A Morris
Alexander W Bruce
University of Cambridge · GBWellcome/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0300723Medical Research Council G0800784Wellcome Trust 064421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The preimplantation mammalian embryo offers a striking opportunity to address the question of how and why apparently identical cells take on separate fates. Two cell fate decisions are taken before the embryo implants; these decisions set apart a group of pluripotent cells, progenitors for the future body, from the distinct extraembryonic lineages of trophectoderm and primitive endoderm. New molecular, cellular and developmental insights reveal the interplay of transcriptional regulation, epigenetic modifications, cell position and cell polarity in these two fate decisions in the mouse. We discuss how mechanisms proposed in previously distinct models might work in concert to progressively reinforce cell fate decisions through feedback loops.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlastocystCell LineageEmbryo, MammalianEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMicePluripotent Stem CellsTranscription, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID19536196
OpenAlexW2062691001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.