Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19535546›Full record

ArticleGenetics2009

A new standard genetic map for the laboratory mouse.

Allison Cox, Cheryl L Ackert-Bicknell, Beth L Dumont, Yueming Ding, Jordana Tzenova Bell, Gudrun A Brockmann, Jon E Wergedal, Carol Bult, Beverly Paigen, Jonathan Flint and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 166 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
166citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

166 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 244 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Identification of Genomic Regions Implicated in Susceptibility toInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

106 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Allison CoxThe Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609, USA.
Cheryl L Ackert-Bicknell
Beth L Dumont
Yueming Ding
Jordana Tzenova Bell
Gudrun A Brockmann
Jon E Wergedal
Carol Bult
Beverly Paigen
Jonathan Flint
Shirng-Wern Tsaih
Gary A Churchill
Karl W Broman
Jackson Laboratory · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USCentre for Human Genetics · GBHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEJerry L. Pettis Memorial VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI William Carl Skarnes · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
UNC and PERLEGEN, IncP50GM076468 · NIGMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI PETKOV, PETKO M · 2006 to 2015
$31.0M
Systems Genetic Analysis of Multi-parent CrossesR01GM070683 · NIGMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BROMAN, KARL W, CHURCHILL, GARY A · 2004 to 2022
$6.8M
From QTL to Gene for HDL CholesterolR37HL077796 · NHLBI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI PAIGEN, BEVERLY J · 2009 to 2018
$4.3M
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGYT32HD007065 · NICHD · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BRAUN, ROBERT E · 1985 to 2020
$2.6M
Statistical Methods and Software for QTL MappingR01GM074244 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BROMAN, KARL W · 2005 to 2013
$2.3M
From QTL to Gene for HDL CholesterolR01HL077796 · NHLBI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI PAIGEN, BEVERLY J · 2004 to 2008
$2.1M
NEW WAYS TO FIND HUMAN BMD GENES USING MOUSE QTL MAPPINGR21AR053992 · NIAMS · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI KARASIK, DAVID · 2007 to 2008
$511k
NCI NIH HHS CA34196NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NHLBI NIH HHS HL077796NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL077796NHLBI NIH HHS R37 HL077796NIAMS NIH HHS AR053992NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR053992NICHD NIH HHS 5T32HD07065NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007065NIGMS NIH HHS GM070683NIGMS NIH HHS GM074244NIGMS NIH HHS GM076468NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM076468NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070683NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074244Wellcome Trust 079912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic maps provide a means to estimate the probability of the co-inheritance of linked loci as they are transmitted across generations in both experimental and natural populations. However, in the age of whole-genome sequences, physical distances measured in base pairs of DNA provide the standard coordinates for navigating the myriad features of genomes. Although genetic and physical maps are colinear, there are well-characterized and sometimes dramatic heterogeneities in the average frequency of meiotic recombination events that occur along the physical extent of chromosomes. There also are documented differences in the recombination landscape between the two sexes. We have revisited high-resolution genetic map data from a large heterogeneous mouse population and have constructed a revised genetic map of the mouse genome, incorporating 10,195 single nucleotide polymorphisms using a set of 47 families comprising 3546 meioses. The revised map provides a different picture of recombination in the mouse from that reported previously. We have further integrated the genetic and physical maps of the genome and incorporated SSLP markers from other genetic maps into this new framework. We demonstrate that utilization of the revised genetic map improves QTL mapping, partially due to the resolution of previously undetected errors in marker ordering along the chromosome.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingAnimalsChromosomesGenetic MarkersGenomeMeiosisMicePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID19535546
PMCPMC2728870
OpenAlexW1992118324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.