Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19535530›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2009

Detection of cryptic genospecies misidentified as Haemophilus influenzae in routine clinical samples by assessment of marker genes fucK, hap, and sodC.

Niels Nørskov-Lauritsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genome Characterisation of InvasivePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Discriminative Potential of the Vitek MSJournal of clinical microbiology · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Population structure in nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Haemophilus haemolyticus isolates causing clinical disease.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Niels Nørskov-LauritsenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, Denmark. nielnoer@rm.dk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae were assessed for the presence of fucK, hap, and sodC by hybridization with gene-specific probes, and isolates diverging from the expected H. influenzae genotype were characterized by phenotype and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Two of 480 isolates were finally classified as variant strains ("nonhemolytic Haemophilus haemolyticus").

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial ProteinsCluster AnalysisDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalHaemophilusHaemophilus InfectionsHumansMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid HybridizationPhosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor)PhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASerine EndopeptidasesBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalHap protein, Hemophilus influenzaePhosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor)RNA, Ribosomal, 16SSerine EndopeptidasesSuperoxide Dismutase

Identifiers

PMID19535530
PMCPMC2725679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.