Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19535107›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2009

Mixed urinary incontinence: greater impact on quality of life.

Anna C Frick, Alison J Huang, Stephen K Van den Eeden, Sharon K Knight, Jennifer M Creasman, Jennifer Yang, Arona I Ragins, David H Thom, Jeanette S Brown

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Efficacy of mace (Arils ofIntegrative medicine research · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical epidemiological insights into urinary incontinence.International urogynecology journal · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anna C FrickDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA. fricka@ccf.org
Alison J Huang
Stephen K Van den Eeden
Sharon K Knight
Jennifer M Creasman
Jennifer Yang
Arona I Ragins
David H Thom
Jeanette S Brown

Funding

CTSA: K12 COMPONENTKL2RR024130 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JOHNSTON, S. CLAIBORNE · 2006 to 2011
$19.3M
Urinary Incontinence: Reproductive/Hormonal Risk FactorsP50DK064538 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BROWN, JEANETTE S · 2002 to 2011
$11.5M
URINARY INCONTINENCE--REPRODUCTIVE/HORMONAL RISK FACTORSR01DK053335 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI THOM, DAVID H · 1998 to 2001
$970k
NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024130NCRR NIH HHS KL2RR024130NIDDK NIH HHS DK53335NIDDK NIH HHS P50 DK064538NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK053335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe compared the impact of mixed, stress and urge urinary incontinence on quality of life in middle-aged or older women. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analyzed cross-sectional data from a population based cohort of 2,109 ethnically diverse middle-aged or older women. Among participants reporting weekly incontinence, clinical type of incontinence was assessed by self-reported questionnaires and disease specific quality of life impact was evaluated using the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the odds of greater quality of life impact from incontinence, defined as an Incontinence Impact Questionnaire score in the 75th percentile or greater in women with stress, urge and mixed incontinence.

resultsMore than 28% (598) of women reported weekly incontinence, including 37% with stress, 31% with urge and 21% with mixed incontinence. Unadjusted Incontinence Impact Questionnaire scores were higher for women with mixed vs urge or stress incontinence (median score 29 vs 17 and 13, respectively, p <0.01). Adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, health status and clinical incontinence severity, women with mixed incontinence were more likely to report a greater overall quality of life impact compared to those with stress incontinence (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.3), as well as a greater specific impact on travel (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.7) and emotional (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.4) Incontinence Impact Questionnaire domains. The overall impact of urge incontinence did not differ significantly from that of stress (urge vs stress OR 1.6, 95% CI 0.9-2.7) or mixed incontinence (mixed vs urge OR 1.6, 95% CI 0.9-2.8) in adjusted models.

conclusionsIn middle-aged or older women mixed incontinence is associated with a greater quality of life impact than stress incontinence independent of age, race, health or incontinence severity. Identification of women with mixed incontinence symptoms may be helpful in discovering which women are most likely to experience functional limitations and decreased well-being from incontinence.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedUrinary Incontinence

Identifiers

PMID19535107
PMCPMC2746250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.