Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19534752›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2009

Databases of homologous gene families for comparative genomics.

Simon Penel, Anne-Muriel Arigon, Jean-François Dufayard, Anne-Sophie Sertier, Vincent Daubin, Laurent Duret, Manolo Gouy, Guy Perrière

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Detection ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Revisiting theNPJ drug discovery · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genomic Insights ofGenes · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Revisiting Shao and Sokal'sJournal of mathematical biology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simon PenelLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, CNRS, Université Claude Bernard - Lyon 1, 43 bd, du 11 Novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France. penel@biomserv.univ-lyon1.fr
Anne-Muriel Arigon
Jean-François Dufayard
Anne-Sophie Sertier
Vincent Daubin
Laurent Duret
Manolo Gouy
Guy Perrière

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComparative genomics is a central step in many sequence analysis studies, from gene annotation and the identification of new functional regions in genomes, to the study of evolutionary processes at the molecular level (speciation, single gene or whole genome duplications, etc.) and phylogenetics. In that context, databases providing users high quality homologous families and sequence alignments as well as phylogenetic trees based on state of the art algorithms are becoming indispensable.

methodsWe developed an automated procedure allowing massive all-against-all similarity searches, gene clustering, multiple alignments computation, and phylogenetic trees construction and reconciliation. The application of this procedure to a very large set of sequences is possible through parallel computing on a large computer cluster.

resultsThree databases were developed using this procedure: HOVERGEN, HOGENOM and HOMOLENS. These databases share the same architecture but differ in their content. HOVERGEN contains sequences from vertebrates, HOGENOM is mainly devoted to completely sequenced microbial organisms, and HOMOLENS is devoted to metazoan genomes from Ensembl. Access to the databases is provided through Web query forms, a general retrieval system and a client-server graphical interface. The later can be used to perform tree-pattern based searches allowing, among other uses, to retrieve sets of orthologous genes. The three databases, as well as the software required to build and query them, can be used or downloaded from the PBIL (Pôle Bioinformatique Lyonnais) site at http://pbil.univ-lyon1.fr/.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisGenomicsInternetPhylogenySequence AlignmentSoftware

Identifiers

PMID19534752
PMCPMC2697650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.