ArticleBMC bioinformatics2009
Visualising biological data: a semantic approach to tool and database integration.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge and Attitudes Among Life Scientists Toward Reproducibility Within Journal Articles: A Research Survey.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2021Article
- In silico Phylogenetic Analysis ofGenes · 2018Article
- Data integration in biological research: an overview.Journal of biological research (Thessalonike, Greece) · 2015Review
- A Methodology for the Development of RESTful Semantic Web Services for Gene Expression Analysis.PloS one · 2015Article
- A comprehensive phylogenetic and structural analysis of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) gene family.Genome biology and evolution · 2014Article
- A comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of deadenylases.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2013Article
- Scientific discovery as a combinatorial optimisation problem: how best to navigate the landscape of possible experiments?BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2012Article
- The PRINTS database: a fine-grained protein sequence annotation and analysis resource--its status in 2012.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2012Article
- An integrated in silico approach to design specific inhibitors targeting human poly(a)-specific ribonuclease.PloS one · 2012Article
- A remote patient monitoring system for congestive heart failure.Journal of medical systems · 2011Article
- Towards a unifying, systems biology understanding of large-scale cellular death and destruction caused by poorly liganded iron: Parkinson's, Huntington's, Alzheimer's, prions, bactericides, chemical toxicology and others as examples.Archives of toxicology · 2010Review
- PeptideMine--a webserver for the design of peptides for protein-peptide binding studies derived from protein-protein interactomes.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
- Utopia documents: linking scholarly literature with research data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010Article
- WIWS: a protein structure bioinformatics Web service collection.Nucleic acids research · 2010Article
- Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles.BMC systems biology · 2010Article
- Visualization of multiple alignments, phylogenies and gene family evolution.Nature methods · 2010Review
- Calling International Rescue: knowledge lost in literature and data landslide!The Biochemical journal · 2009Review
- The 20th anniversary of EMBnet: 20 years of bioinformatics for the Life Sciences community.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationIn the biological sciences, the need to analyse vast amounts of information has become commonplace. Such large-scale analyses often involve drawing together data from a variety of different databases, held remotely on the internet or locally on in-house servers. Supporting these tasks are ad hoc collections of data-manipulation tools, scripting languages and visualisation software, which are often combined in arcane ways to create cumbersome systems that have been customized for a particular purpose, and are consequently not readily adaptable to other uses. For many day-to-day bioinformatics tasks, the sizes of current databases, and the scale of the analyses necessary, now demand increasing levels of automation; nevertheless, the unique experience and intuition of human researchers is still required to interpret the end results in any meaningful biological way. Putting humans in the loop requires tools to support real-time interaction with these vast and complex data-sets. Numerous tools do exist for this purpose, but many do not have optimal interfaces, most are effectively isolated from other tools and databases owing to incompatible data formats, and many have limited real-time performance when applied to realistically large data-sets: much of the user's cognitive capacity is therefore focused on controlling the software and manipulating esoteric file formats rather than on performing the research.
methodsTo confront these issues, harnessing expertise in human-computer interaction (HCI), high-performance rendering and distributed systems, and guided by bioinformaticians and end-user biologists, we are building reusable software components that, together, create a toolkit that is both architecturally sound from a computing point of view, and addresses both user and developer requirements. Key to the system's usability is its direct exploitation of semantics, which, crucially, gives individual components knowledge of their own functionality and allows them to interoperate seamlessly, removing many of the existing barriers and bottlenecks from standard bioinformatics tasks.
resultsThe toolkit, named Utopia, is freely available from http://utopia.cs.man.ac.uk/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.