Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19533772›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2009

High resolution genomic analysis of 18q- using oligo-microarray comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH).

Patricia L Heard, Erika M Carter, Analisa C Crandall, Courtney Sebold, Daniel E Hale, Jannine D Cody

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Chromosome 18 Clinical Resource Center.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. InterstitialMolecular cytogenetics · 2016
    Article
  13. Adults with Chromosome 18 Abnormalities.Journal of genetic counseling · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sensorineural hearing loss in people with deletions of 18q: hearing in 18q-.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Pitt-Hopkins Syndrome.Molecular syndromology · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patricia L HeardDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78229, USA.
Erika M Carter
Analisa C Crandall
Courtney Sebold
Daniel E Hale
Jannine D Cody
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

ZOLEDRONATE VS AREDIA IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA/BREAST CANCER W /BONE DISORDERSM01RR001346 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FERRER, ROBERT L · 1985 to 2008
$23.1M
Identification of Dosage Sensitive Genes on 18qR01HD045907 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CODY, JANNINE DE MARS · 2004 to 2007
$1.4M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR001346NCRR NIH HHS M01-RR-001346NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD045907NICHD NIH HHS R01HD045907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) has revolutionized diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities in the genetics clinic. This new technology also has valuable potential as a research tool to investigate larger genomic rearrangements that are typically diagnosed via routine karyotype. aCGH was used as a tool for the high-resolution analysis of chromosome content in individuals with known deletions of chromosome 18. The aim of this study was to clarify the precise location of the breakpoints as well as to determine the presence of occult translocations creating additional deletions and duplications. One hundred eighty-nine DNA samples from individuals with 18q deletions were analyzed. No breakpoint clusters were identified, as no more than two individuals had breakpoints within 2 kb of each other. Only two regions of 18q were never found to be haploid, suggesting the existence of haplolethal genes in those regions. Of the individuals with only a chromosome 18 abnormality, 17% (n = 29) had interstitial deletions. Six percent (n = 11) had a region of duplication immediately proximal to the deletion. Eight percent (n = 15) had more complex rearrangements with captured (non-18q) telomeres thus creating a trisomic region. The 15 captured telomeres originated from a limited number of other telomeres (4q, 10q, 17p, 18p, 20q, and Xq). These data were converted into a format for ease of viewing and analysis by creating custom tracks for the UCSC Genome Browser. Taken together, these findings confirm a higher level of variability and genomic complexity surrounding deletions of 18q than has previously been appreciated.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 18Chromosome DeletionChromosome MappingComparative Genomic HybridizationGenotypeHomozygoteHumansKaryotypingMicroarray AnalysisPloidiesSoftware

Identifiers

PMID19533772
PMCPMC2731576
OpenAlexW2123052390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.