Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19533212›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2009

Comparative genomics of Drosophila mtDNA: Novel features of conservation and change across functional domains and lineages.

Kristi L Montooth, Dawn N Abt, Jeffrey W Hofmann, David M Rand

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. FreeClimber: automated quantification of climbing performance inThe Journal of experimental biology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Mitonuclear conflict and cooperation govern the integration of genotypes, phenotypes and environments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristi L MontoothDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, 47405, USA. montooth@indiana.edu
Dawn N Abt
Jeffrey W Hofmann
David M Rand
Brown University · USIndiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

Nuclear-Mitochondrial Fitness Interactions in DrosophilaR01GM067862 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI RAND, DAVID M · 2004 to 2020
$5.1M
Drosophila energetics and mito-nuclear functionF32GM076812 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MONTOOTH, KRISTI L · 2006 to 2007
$95k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM076812NIGMS NIH HHS GM067862NIGMS NIH HHS GM076812NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To gain insight on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) evolution, we assembled and analyzed the mitochondrial genomes of Drosophila erecta, D. ananassae, D. persimilis, D. willistoni, D. mojavensis, D. virilis and D. grimshawi together with the sequenced mtDNAs of the melanogaster subgroup. Genomic comparisons across the well-defined Drosophila phylogeny impart power for detecting conserved mtDNA regions that maintain metabolic function and regions that evolve uniquely on lineages. Evolutionary rate varies across intergenic regions of the mtDNA. Rapidly evolving intergenic regions harbor the majority of mitochondrial indel divergence. In contrast, patterns of nearly perfect conservation within intergenic regions reveal a refined set of nucleotides underlying the binding of transcription termination factors. Sequencing of 5' cDNA ends indicates that cytochrome C oxidase I (CoI) has a novel (T/C)CG start codon and that perfectly conserved regions upstream of two NADH dehydrogenase (ND) genes are transcribed and likely extend these protein sequences. Substitutions at synonymous sites in the Drosophila mitochondrial proteomes reflect a mutation process that is biased toward A and T nucleotides and differs between mtDNA strands. Differences in codon usage bias across genes reveal that weak selection at silent sites may offset the mutation bias. The mutation-selection balance at synonymous sites has also diverged between the Drosophila and Sophophora lineages. Rates of evolution are highly heterogeneous across the mitochondrial proteome, with ND accumulating many more amino acid substitutions than CO. These oxidative phosphorylation complex-specific rates of evolution vary across lineages and may reflect physiological and ecological change across the Drosophila phylogeny.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, MitochondrialAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase CompositionBase SequenceBayes TheoremConserved SequenceDNA, IntergenicDNA, MitochondrialDrosophilaElectron Transport Chain Complex ProteinsGenomicsMitochondrial ProteinsModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataDNA, IntergenicDNA, MitochondrialElectron Transport Chain Complex ProteinsMitochondrial ProteinsRNA, Transfer

Identifiers

PMID19533212
PMCPMC2895726
OpenAlexW2086619638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.