ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2009
Comparative genomics of Drosophila mtDNA: Novel features of conservation and change across functional domains and lineages.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Absence of Mother's Curse for performance traits among divergent mtDNAs in heterozygous nuclear backgrounds in Drosophila.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Phylogenomic Analysis Reveals Evolutionary Relationships of Tropical Drosophilidae: FromEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Limited Variation in Codon Usage across Mitochondrial Genomes of Non-Biting Midges (Diptera: Chironomidae).Insects · 2024Article
- Review
- Comparative mitogenomics of Drosophilidae and the evolution of the Zygothrica genus group (Diptera, Drosophilidae).Genetica · 2021Article
- FreeClimber: automated quantification of climbing performance inThe Journal of experimental biology · 2021Article
- A High-Quality Genome Assembly from Short and Long Reads for the Non-biting MidgeG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Mitonuclear conflict and cooperation govern the integration of genotypes, phenotypes and environments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Mitochondrial genomic variation drives differential nuclear gene expression in discrete regions of Drosophila gene and protein interaction networks.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- What does mitogenomics tell us about the evolutionary history of the Drosophila buzzatii cluster (repleta group)?PloS one · 2019Article
- Stable genetic structure and connectivity in pollution-adapted and nearby pollution-sensitive populations ofRoyal Society open science · 2018Article
- Mitogenome Sequencing in the Genus Camelus Reveals Evidence for Purifying Selection and Long-term Divergence between Wild and Domestic Bactrian Camels.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Article
- Integrative Approaches for Studying Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genome Co-evolution in Oxidative Phosphorylation.Frontiers in genetics · 2017Article
- The Roles of Compensatory Evolution and Constraint in Aminoacyl tRNA Synthetase Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2016Article
- Article
- Heterogeneous natural selection on oxidative phosphorylation genes among fishes with extreme high and low aerobic performance.BMC evolutionary biology · 2015Article
- Similar Efficacies of Selection Shape Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genes in Both Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2015Article
- Population Genomics of Infectious and Integrated Wolbachia pipientis Genomes in Drosophila ananassae.Genome biology and evolution · 2015Article
- Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of flower-breeding Drosophila incompta (Diptera, Drosophilidae).Genetica · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To gain insight on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) evolution, we assembled and analyzed the mitochondrial genomes of Drosophila erecta, D. ananassae, D. persimilis, D. willistoni, D. mojavensis, D. virilis and D. grimshawi together with the sequenced mtDNAs of the melanogaster subgroup. Genomic comparisons across the well-defined Drosophila phylogeny impart power for detecting conserved mtDNA regions that maintain metabolic function and regions that evolve uniquely on lineages. Evolutionary rate varies across intergenic regions of the mtDNA. Rapidly evolving intergenic regions harbor the majority of mitochondrial indel divergence. In contrast, patterns of nearly perfect conservation within intergenic regions reveal a refined set of nucleotides underlying the binding of transcription termination factors. Sequencing of 5' cDNA ends indicates that cytochrome C oxidase I (CoI) has a novel (T/C)CG start codon and that perfectly conserved regions upstream of two NADH dehydrogenase (ND) genes are transcribed and likely extend these protein sequences. Substitutions at synonymous sites in the Drosophila mitochondrial proteomes reflect a mutation process that is biased toward A and T nucleotides and differs between mtDNA strands. Differences in codon usage bias across genes reveal that weak selection at silent sites may offset the mutation bias. The mutation-selection balance at synonymous sites has also diverged between the Drosophila and Sophophora lineages. Rates of evolution are highly heterogeneous across the mitochondrial proteome, with ND accumulating many more amino acid substitutions than CO. These oxidative phosphorylation complex-specific rates of evolution vary across lineages and may reflect physiological and ecological change across the Drosophila phylogeny.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.