ReviewDer Nervenarzt2009
[Off-label use in child and adolescent psychiatry. An ongoing ethical, medical and legal problem].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The implementation of the guideline for the management of pediatric off-label use of drugs in China: a cross-sectional study.Translational pediatrics · 2024Article
- Low dopamine function in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: should genotyping signify early diagnosis in children?Postgraduate medicine · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Off-label use is an ongoing problem in child and adolescent psychiatry. Except methylphenidate and atomoxetine for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), most substances used to treat children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders are prescribed off-label. In additional to aspects of drug safety and efficacy the widespread off-label use raises issues of liability in the case of adverse events. In Germany off-label use also poses problems of reimbursement by the health insurance. In the future we expect, driven by written request of the FDA, numerous new indications for novel antipsychotics in the USA for the treatment of so-called childhood bipolar disorders. Given another diagnostic framework in context in Europe, these so-called bipolar disorders in children are very rarely diagnosed. Anyhow, antipsychotics are widely used in the USA and in Europe to treat impulsivity or aggressiveness in children and adolescents. There is still a lack of European labelling of novel antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia. In clinical practice given the risk of liability and other forensic issues in the treatment of schizophrenic patients, this is still one of the major hindrances in the treatment of young schizophrenic patients in Europe. Whereas these drugs may urgently be needed for treatment of psychotic disorders and of impulsivity or aggressiveness, the indication of bipolar as used in the USA leads to a misconception and does not increase availability of licensed modern antipsychotics for minors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.