Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19532040›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2009

Cognitive abilities and behaviour of children exposed to antiepileptic drugs in utero.

Rebecca L Bromley, Gus A Baker, Kimford J Meador

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Antiepileptic drugs and pregnancy outcomes.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2012
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Teratogenic effects of antiepileptic drugs.Expert review of neurotherapeutics · 2010
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebecca L BromleyDepartment of Neurological Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Gus A Baker
Kimford J Meador

Funding

NEURODEVELOPMENT EFFECTS OF ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGSR01NS038455 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MEADOR, KIMFORD J · 2000 to 2009
$12.0M
NINDS NIH HHS 5R01-NS038455NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe last two decades have witnessed a growing concern over the treatment of epilepsy in women of childbearing age, with an increased risk of major congenital malformations and possible cognitive difficulties associated with certain antiepileptic drugs. The aim here is to review the literature regarding the possible cognitive and behavioural impact of exposure to antiepileptic drugs in utero. RECENT

findingsRecent evidence from large prospective cohorts indicates that there is a longer term risk to the cognitive and behavioural development of the child exposed in utero to sodium valproate. Information on other antiepileptic agents is conflicting or nonexistent and more research in this area is urgently required. SUMMARY: Despite the methodological shortfalls of some of the research in this area, there is an accumulation of evidence highlighting an increased risk for cognitive and behavioural difficulties in children exposed to sodium valproate in utero. Although less certain, there may also be risks associated with phenobarbital and phenytoin exposure. Information regarding these risks should be communicated to the potential mother who has epilepsy.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, Drug-InducedAnticonvulsantsChildChild BehaviorCognitionCognition DisordersDevelopmental DisabilitiesFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAnticonvulsants

Identifiers

PMID19532040
PMCPMC2743524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.