Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19531618›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2009

A systematic review of interventions to improve recall of medical advice in healthcare consultations.

Philip W B Watson, Brian McKinstry

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 86 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02505607 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Overactive Bladder Education

TypeinterventionalSponsorHartford HospitalRan2015 to 2015Enrolled22ConditionsUrinary Bladder, Overactive, Urinary Incontinence, UrgeArmsOveractive Bladder Care Plan counseling
NCT04970615 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Educating Brain Tumor Patients Using Patient-specific Actual-size Three-dimensional Printed Models: a Case-control Study

TypeobservationalSponsorSümeyye SezerRan2021 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsBrain Tumor, Glioma, Glioblastoma, AstrocytomaArmsThree-dimensional printed model
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Improving cancer clinical trial enrollment and patient understanding using TrialTalk, a structured communication method: a pilot randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Communication and patient participation influencing patient recall of treatment discussions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Philip W B WatsonCentre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK. Philip.watson@ed.ac.uk
Brian McKinstry

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZG/2/299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order for patients to adhere to healthcare advice, it is essential that they are able to recall this following a consultation. Although psychological research exists which highlights techniques and factors postulated to influence recall, only a limited body of work has been conducted to evaluate their effectiveness in a clinical context.

aimTo carry out a systematic review of intervention trials designed to enhance recall of medical information.

methodsWe searched Medline (1950-April 2007); Embase (1980-April 2007); Cinahl (1982-April 2007); PsychINFO (1969-2007); and the Cochrane Library Collection. Secondary searches were made through reference to relevant journals and reference lists from relevant papers/review papers.

resultsFrom 69 papers provisionally identified, 34 papers met the inclusion criteria. Nine recall interventions had been evaluated (audio recordings, written materials, adjunct questions, prompt sheets, visual aids, cognitive strategies, rehearsal, communication styles and personalized teaching). Despite the experimental and theoretical evidence which could have informed cognitive interventions to enhance recall of healthcare advice, most studies primarily focused on the use of written and/or audio-recorded medical instructions. Although the majority of studies supported these approaches insofar as they enhanced recall, the findings were equivocal.

conclusionWhile written and tape-recorded instructions appear to improve recall in most situations, a dearth of interventions incorporating psychological theory was readily apparent. Further research is required in clinical settings to determine if cognitive interventions based on a more over-arching psychological model of recall are effective.

Indexed as

Mental RecallPatient Education as TopicDelivery of Health CareHumansPatient Compliance

Identifiers

PMID19531618
PMCPMC2697041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.