Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19530743›Full record

ReviewDrug safety2009

Pharmacokinetic changes of psychotropic drugs in patients with liver disease: implications for dose adaptation.

Chantal Schlatter, Sabin S Egger, Lydia Tchambaz, Stephan Krähenbühl

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chantal SchlatterDivision of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Sabin S Egger
Lydia Tchambaz
Stephan Krähenbühl
University Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dose adjustment of psychotropic drugs in patients with liver cirrhosis may be important as most of these drugs are predominantly eliminated by the liver and many of them are associated with dose-dependent adverse reactions. As no surrogate parameter is available to predict hepatic metabolism of drugs, dose adjustment according to pharmacokinetic properties of the drugs is proposed. Psychotropic drugs (antiepileptics, antiparkinsonian drugs, psycholeptics such as antipsychotics, anxiolytics, sedatives and hypnosedatives, and psychoanaleptics such as antidepressants, psychostimulants and antidementia drugs) marketed in Switzerland in 2006 were therefore classified according to their hepatic extraction and/or bioavailability to predict their kinetic behaviour in patients with cirrhosis. The expected changes in hepatic metabolism predicted by pharmacokinetic properties were compared with the results from kinetic studies carried out in patients with liver disease. These studies were identified using MEDLINE searches. Of the 116 psychotropic drugs available on the Swiss market by the year 2006, only 12 were predominantly eliminated through the kidney. For five substances, no Q(0) value (the dose fraction metabolized or excreted extra-renally) could be determined because of lack of pharmacokinetic data. Of 99 drugs with predominant hepatic metabolism, 29.3% were categorized as high, 25.2% as intermediate and 38.4% as low extraction drugs, while seven substances could not be classified. Pharmacokinetic studies in patients with liver disease were available for 55 of these 99 drugs eliminated predominantly by the liver (Q(0)-value > or = 0.5). Only a few kinetic studies in patients with liver disease were found for antipsychotics, antiparkinsonian drugs and antidepressants, except for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and some newer antidepressants. The expected changes in pharmacokinetics were generally in good agreement with the changes reported in pharmacokinetic studies. For 12 drugs, the observed changes in pharmacokinetics from clinical studies were different from the changes expected based on their classification. However, for low extraction drugs metabolized by cytochrome P450 isozymes, clearance may be reduced by up to 50%. In conclusion, the classification of drugs according to their hepatic extraction and/or bioavailability is a useful tool for dose adjustment, if information from clinical studies is lacking. There is a gap in information about pharmacokinetic changes in patients with liver cirrhosis for a large number of centrally acting drugs. Kinetic studies for centrally acting drugs with predominant hepatic metabolism should be carried out in patients with liver disease to allow precise dose recommendations for enhanced patient safety.

Indexed as

Biological AvailabilityClinical Trials as TopicCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansLiver CirrhosisPsychotropic DrugsSwitzerlandCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemPsychotropic Drugs

Identifiers

PMID19530743
OpenAlexW2122895462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.