ReviewDrug safety2009
Pharmacokinetic changes of psychotropic drugs in patients with liver disease: implications for dose adaptation.
Review in Drug safety, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dose Recommendations for Common Drugs in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Literature Review.Clinical drug investigation · 2023Pooled it
- Evaluating the safety and dosing of drugs in patients with liver cirrhosis by literature review and expert opinion.BMJ open · 2016Pooled it
- Dose Recommendations for Drugs in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis (The ALIVe Study): Protocol for a Multiphase Validation and Consensus Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About the Physical Manifestations of Psychiatric Illness and Treatment.Journal of palliative medicine · 2024Article
- Impact of CYP2D6*2, CYP2D6*35, rs5758550, and related haplotypes on risperidone clearance in vivo.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Article
- Why zolpidem increases the risk of falls and fractures in patients with cirrhosis.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2022Article
- Improving Medication-Related Outcomes in Chronic Liver Disease.Hepatology communications · 2020Review
- Evidence-Based Recommendations to Improve the Safe Use of Drugs in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis.Drug safety · 2018Review
- Development and Application of an UHPLC-MS/MS Method for Comparative Pharmacokinetic Study of Eight Major Bioactive Components from Yin Chen Hao Tang in Normal and Acute Liver Injured Rats.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2018Article
- Pharmacokinetics of antidepressants in patients with hepatic impairment.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2014Review
- Article
- Dose adjustment in patients with liver cirrhosis: impact on adverse drug reactions and hospitalizations.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dose adjustment of psychotropic drugs in patients with liver cirrhosis may be important as most of these drugs are predominantly eliminated by the liver and many of them are associated with dose-dependent adverse reactions. As no surrogate parameter is available to predict hepatic metabolism of drugs, dose adjustment according to pharmacokinetic properties of the drugs is proposed. Psychotropic drugs (antiepileptics, antiparkinsonian drugs, psycholeptics such as antipsychotics, anxiolytics, sedatives and hypnosedatives, and psychoanaleptics such as antidepressants, psychostimulants and antidementia drugs) marketed in Switzerland in 2006 were therefore classified according to their hepatic extraction and/or bioavailability to predict their kinetic behaviour in patients with cirrhosis. The expected changes in hepatic metabolism predicted by pharmacokinetic properties were compared with the results from kinetic studies carried out in patients with liver disease. These studies were identified using MEDLINE searches. Of the 116 psychotropic drugs available on the Swiss market by the year 2006, only 12 were predominantly eliminated through the kidney. For five substances, no Q(0) value (the dose fraction metabolized or excreted extra-renally) could be determined because of lack of pharmacokinetic data. Of 99 drugs with predominant hepatic metabolism, 29.3% were categorized as high, 25.2% as intermediate and 38.4% as low extraction drugs, while seven substances could not be classified. Pharmacokinetic studies in patients with liver disease were available for 55 of these 99 drugs eliminated predominantly by the liver (Q(0)-value > or = 0.5). Only a few kinetic studies in patients with liver disease were found for antipsychotics, antiparkinsonian drugs and antidepressants, except for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and some newer antidepressants. The expected changes in pharmacokinetics were generally in good agreement with the changes reported in pharmacokinetic studies. For 12 drugs, the observed changes in pharmacokinetics from clinical studies were different from the changes expected based on their classification. However, for low extraction drugs metabolized by cytochrome P450 isozymes, clearance may be reduced by up to 50%. In conclusion, the classification of drugs according to their hepatic extraction and/or bioavailability is a useful tool for dose adjustment, if information from clinical studies is lacking. There is a gap in information about pharmacokinetic changes in patients with liver cirrhosis for a large number of centrally acting drugs. Kinetic studies for centrally acting drugs with predominant hepatic metabolism should be carried out in patients with liver disease to allow precise dose recommendations for enhanced patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.