Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19530249›Full record

ReviewProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2009

Interaction and conformational dynamics of membrane-spanning protein helices.

Dieter Langosch, Isaiah T Arkin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Structural Features of a Tiny Viral Protein, ORF7b of SARS-CoV-2.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Insights into Peptidyl-ProlylPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Spiers Memorial Lecture: Analysis andFaraday discussions · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Quarterly reviews of biophysics · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dieter LangoschLehrstuhl Chemie der Biopolymere, Technische Universität München, Weihenstephaner Berg 3, 85354 Freising, Germany. langosch@lrz.tum.de
Isaiah T Arkin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within 1 or 2 decades, the reputation of membrane-spanning alpha-helices has changed dramatically. Once mostly regarded as dull membrane anchors, transmembrane domains are now recognized as major instigators of protein-protein interaction. These interactions may be of exquisite specificity in mediating assembly of stable membrane protein complexes from cognate subunits. Further, they can be reversible and regulatable by external factors to allow for dynamic changes of protein conformation in biological function. Finally, these helices are increasingly regarded as dynamic domains. These domains can move relative to each other in different functional protein conformations. In addition, small-scale backbone fluctuations may affect their function and their impact on surrounding lipid shells. Elucidating the ways by which these intricate structural features are encoded by the amino acid sequences will be a fascinating subject of research for years to come.

Indexed as

Cell MembraneMembrane ProteinsModels, MolecularProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProtein MultimerizationProtein Structure, SecondaryMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19530249
PMCPMC2775205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.