ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2010
Protein kinase inhibitors emodin and dichloro-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole modulate the cellular accumulation and cytotoxicity of cisplatin in a schedule-dependent manner.
Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The versatile emodin: A natural easily acquired anthraquinone possesses promising anticancer properties against a variety of cancers.International journal of biological sciences · 2022Review
- Review
- Article
- Transporter-Mediated Interaction Between Platinum Drugs and Sorafenib at the Cellular Level.The AAPS journal · 2017Article
- LY2109761 enhances cisplatin antitumor activity in ovarian cancer cells.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeProtein kinase inhibitors (PKI) have become prominent agents in cancer therapeutics. However, the specificity for target kinase inhibition can be poor and unwanted effects can emerge in combination regimens. The PKI emodin, for instance, can produce mixed results when combined with cisplatin, and we have sought a biochemical pharmacologic explanation for the negative cytotoxic effects.
methodsHuman ovarian A2780 tumor cells were exposed to the PKI emodin or dichloro-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole (DRB) with cisplatin using several schedules, and cytotoxicity determined by a growth inhibition assay. Intracellular platinum levels and DNA adducts were estimated by flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry.
resultsWhen A2780 cells were exposed first to emodin or DRB and then to cisplatin alone, the cytotoxic effects of cisplatin were significantly enhanced, whereas simultaneous exposure did not enhance the cytotoxicity, but instead inhibited it in the case of DRB. The increase in activity of cisplatin in the sequenced schedule was not due to increases in intracellular levels of cisplatin or DNA adducts, whereas the cytotoxic inhibition was related to a significant fall in both intracellular platinum levels and DNA adducts, which were ascribed to inhibition in cisplatin uptake. Knockdown of hCtr1 (the human copper transporter 1) by siRNA abrogated this inhibition in cisplatin uptake.
conclusionThe results demonstrate that co-exposure of tumor cells to emodin or DRB with cisplatin inhibits platinum drug uptake by impacting the hCtr1 transporter and, thereby, reduce the cytotoxicity of cisplatin. Based on our findings, scheduling of the PKI and the cytotoxic agent should be a major consideration in the clinical design of combination regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.