Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19529913›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2009

Mechanical complications during central venous cannulations in pediatric patients.

Corsino Rey, Francisco Alvarez, Victoria De La Rua, Alberto Medina, Andrés Concha, Juan José Díaz, Sergio Menéndez, Marta Los Arcos, Juan Mayordomo-Colunga

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04522778 (Innovative Central Line Securement Device), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04522778 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Innovative Central Line Securement Device: Line Complications and Quality of Life in the Pediatric Population as Compared to Traditional Securement Device

TypeinterventionalSponsorRyan St. Pierre-HetzRan2020 to 2023Enrolled23ConditionsCentral Line Complication, Central Line Infection, Central Line-Associated Infection, Central Line SepsisArmsWearable Central Line Securement Device (Vest), Traditional Securement Dressing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Central Venous Catheter Insertion for Vascular Access: A 6-year Single-center Experience.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Corsino ReyPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, University of Oviedo, Celestino Villamil s/n 33006, Asturias, Oviedo, Spain. corsino.rey@sespa.princast.es
Francisco Alvarez
Victoria De La Rua
Alberto Medina
Andrés Concha
Juan José Díaz
Sergio Menéndez
Marta Los Arcos
Juan Mayordomo-Colunga

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIdentification of early mechanical complications (EMC) of central venous catheterizations (CVC) in pediatric patients and determination of EMC risk factors.

designProspective observational study.

settingPediatric intensive-care unit in a university hospital. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Eight-hundred and twenty-five CVC were performed in 546 patients. Age, weight, gender, mechanical ventilation, analgesia, resident CVC failure, CVC indication, admission diagnosis, emergency or scheduled procedure, type of catheter (diameter, lumen number), catheter final location, number of attempts, and EMC were recorded. Risk factors for EMC were determined by multivariate analysis.

resultsMedian patient age was 22.0 months (0-216 months). CVC was an emergency procedure in 421 (51%) cases, scheduled in 336 (40.7%), and guide-wire exchanged in 68 (8.2%). There were 293 (35.5%) internal jugular, 116 (14.1%) subclavian, and 416 (50.4%) femoral catheters. CVC was performed by staff physicians in 35.8% cases, supervised residents in 43.4%, and staff after resident failure in 20.8%. 151 EMC occurred in 144 CVC (17.5%). The most common EMC were arterial puncture (n = 60; 7.2%), catheter malposition (n = 39; 4.7%), arrhythmias (n = 19; 2.3%), and hematoma (n = 12; 1.4%). Resident failure to perform CVC (OR 2.53; CI 95% 1.53-4.16), high venous access (subclavian or jugular) (OR 1.91; CI 95% 1.26-2.88), and number of attempts (OR 1.10; CI 95% 1.03-1.17) were independently associated with EMC.

conclusionsEMC of CVC were common in a teaching university hospital, but severe complications were very uncommon. Resident failure to perform CVC, high venous access, and number of attempts were independent risk factors for EMC of CVC.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, PediatricAdolescentCatheterization, Central VenousChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMultivariate AnalysisPerioperative CareProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.