Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19529830›Full record

ReviewMolecular plant2009

Learning from evolution: Thellungiella generates new knowledge on essential and critical components of abiotic stress tolerance in plants.

Anna Amtmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular plant, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
29.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 241 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. The Small Auxin-Up RNA 50 (SAUR50) Gene fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Adaptative Mechanisms of HalophyticFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna AmtmannPlant Science Group, FBLS, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK. a.amtmann@bio.gla.ac.uk
University of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thellungiella salsuginea (halophila) is a close relative of Arabidopsis thaliana but, unlike A. thaliana, it grows well in extreme conditions of cold, salt, and drought as well as nitrogen limitation. Over the last decade, many laboratories have started to use Thellungiella to investigate the physiological, metabolic, and molecular mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance in plants, and new knowledge has been gained in particular with respect to ion transport and gene expression. The advantage of Thellungiella over other extremophile model plants is that it can be directly compared with Arabidopsis, and therefore generate information on both essential and critical components of stress tolerance. Thellungiella research is supported by a growing body of technical resources comprising physiological and molecular protocols, ecotype collections, expressed sequence tags, cDNA-libraries, microarrays, and a pending genome sequence. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge on Thellungiella and re-evaluates its usefulness as a model for research into plant stress tolerance.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBiological EvolutionStress, PhysiologicalArabidopsisDNA, ComplementaryGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantDNA, Complementaryabiotic/environmental stressadaptation - evolutionaryBrassicacomparative genomicsgene expressionion channels

Identifiers

PMID19529830
PMCPMC2639741
OpenAlexW1973564485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.