Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19528327›Full record

ArticleGenetics2009

High-throughput multiplex sequencing to discover copy number variants in Drosophila.

Bryce Daines, Hui Wang, Yumei Li, Yi Han, Richard Gibbs, Rui Chen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Bayesian localization of CNV candidates in WGS data within minutes.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Copy number polymorphism in plant genomes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2014
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bryce DainesMolecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Hui Wang
Yumei Li
Yi Han
Richard Gibbs
Rui Chen
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

The Human Genome Sequencing CenterU54HG003273 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GIBBS, RICHARD A · 2004 to 2015
$341.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG003273NHGRI NIH HHS U54HG003273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copy number variation (CNV) contributes in phenotypically relevant ways to the genetic variability of many organisms. Cost-effective genomewide methods for identifying copy number variation are necessary to elucidate the contribution that these structural variants make to the genomes of model organisms. We have developed a novel approach for the identification of copy number variation by next generation sequencing. As a proof of concept our method has been applied to map the deletions of three Drosophila deficiency strains. We demonstrate that low sequence coverage is sufficient for identifying and mapping large deletions at kilobase resolution, suggesting that data generated from high-throughput sequencing experiments are sufficient for simultaneously analyzing many strains. Genomic DNA from two Drosophila deficiency stocks was barcoded and sequenced in multiplex, and the breakpoints associated with each deletion were successfully identified. The approach we describe is immediately applicable to the systematic exploration of copy number variation in model organisms and humans.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterGenome, InsectMethodsSequence Analysis, DNASequence Deletion

Identifiers

PMID19528327
PMCPMC2728881
OpenAlexW2125888786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.