ArticleGenetics2009
Genome engineering-based analysis of Bearded family genes reveals both functional redundancy and a nonessential function in lateral inhibition in Drosophila.
Article in Genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ectoderm tensile stress controls mesoderm internalization during embryo gastrulation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Cis-inhibition suppresses basal Notch signaling during sensory organ precursor selection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Regulation of Notch output dynamics via specific E(spl)-HLH factors during bristle patterning in Drosophila.Nature communications · 2019Article
- A population of adult satellite-like cells ineLife · 2018Article
- Activation of the Notch Signaling Pathway In Vivo Elicits Changes in CSL Nuclear Dynamics.Developmental cell · 2018Article
- Stereotypical architecture of the stem cell niche is spatiotemporally established by miR-125-dependent coordination of Notch and steroid signaling.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2018Article
- Spatial regulation of contractility by Neuralized and Bearded during furrow invagination in Drosophila.Nature communications · 2017Article
- miR-7 Buffers Differentiation in the Developing Drosophila Visual System.Cell reports · 2017Article
- Neuralized regulates Crumbs endocytosis and epithelium morphogenesis via specific Stardust isoforms.The Journal of cell biology · 2017Article
- Control of Neural Daughter Cell Proliferation by Multi-level Notch/Su(H)/E(spl)-HLH Signaling.PLoS genetics · 2016Article
- A re-examination of the selection of the sensory organ precursor of the bristle sensilla of Drosophila melanogaster.PLoS genetics · 2015Article
- Regulation of epithelial polarity by the E3 ubiquitin ligase Neuralized and the Bearded inhibitors in Drosophila.Nature cell biology · 2012Article
- The Enhancer of split complex arose prior to the diversification of schizophoran flies and is strongly conserved between Drosophila and stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae).BMC evolutionary biology · 2011Article
- Notch ligand ubiquitylation: what is it good for?Developmental cell · 2011Review
- Neuralized promotes basal to apical transcytosis of delta in epithelial cells.Molecular biology of the cell · 2010Article
- Endocytosis and intracellular trafficking of Notch and its ligands.Current topics in developmental biology · 2010Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lateral inhibition mediated by Notch receptor signaling regulates the determination of sensory organ precursor cells (SOPs) in Drosophila. The selection of SOPs from proneural cluster cells appears to rely on a negative feedback loop linking activation of the Notch receptor to downregulation of its ligand Delta within each cell. The molecular basis of this regulatory feedback mechanism is not known. Here, we have tested the role of the Bearded (Brd) family genes in this process. The Drosophila genome encodes eight Brd family members that interact with the E3 ubiquitin ligase Neuralized (Neur) and act as inhibitors of Neur-mediated Delta signaling. Genome engineering technologies were used to create specific deletions of all eight Brd family genes. We find that the Brd family genes malpha, m4, and m6 encoded by the Enhancer of split Complex (E(spl)-C) are dispensable for Drosophila development and that deletion of the five Brd family genes encoded by the Brd Complex only reduces viability. However, deletion of all Brd family genes results in embryonic lethality. Additionally, the malpha, m4, and m6 genes act redundantly with the other five Brd family genes to spatially restrict Notch activation in stage 5 embryos. These data reveal that the Brd family genes have an essential but redundant activity. While the activity of all eight Brd genes appears to be dispensable for SOP determination, clone border studies indicate that both the relative activity levels of Neur and Brd family members influence competition for the SOP fate during lateral inhibition. We propose that inhibition of Neur-Delta interaction by Brd family members is part of the feedback loop that underlies lateral inhibition in Drosophila.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.