Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19528232›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2009

The Ime2 protein kinase enhances the disassociation of the Sum1 repressor from middle meiotic promoters.

Noreen T Ahmed, David Bungard, Marcus E Shin, Michael Moore, Edward Winter

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Membrane and organelle rearrangement during ascospore formation in budding yeast.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  3. Meiotic Cytokinesis inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Kar4 is Required for the Normal Pattern of Meiotic Gene Expression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Kar4, the Yeast Homolog of METTL14, is Required for mRNA mbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Phospho-Regulation of Meiotic Prophase.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Noreen T AhmedThomas Jefferson University, 233 S. 10th St., Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
David Bungard
Marcus E Shin
Michael Moore
Edward Winter
Thomas Jefferson University · USThe Wistar Institute · US

Funding

THE SMKI MAPK AND SPORE DEVELOPMENT IN SACCHAROMYCESR01GM061817 · NIGMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI WINTER, EDWARD P · 2000 to 2010
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM061817NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiotic development in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (sporulation) is controlled by the sequential transcription of temporally distinct sets of meiosis-specific genes. The induction of middle genes controls exit from meiotic prophase, the completion of the nuclear divisions, and spore formation. Middle promoters are controlled through DNA elements termed middle sporulation elements (MSEs) that are bound by the Sum1 repressor during vegetative growth and by the Ndt80 activator during meiosis. It has been proposed that the induction of middle promoters is controlled by competition between Ndt80 and Sum1 for MSE occupancy. Here, we show that the Sum1 repressor can be removed from middle promoters in meiotic cells independent of Ndt80 expression. This process requires the phosphorylation of Sum1 by the meiosis-specific cyclin-dependent kinase-like kinase Ime2. The deletion of HST1, which encodes a Sir2 paralog that interacts with Sum1, bypasses the requirement for this phosphorylation. These findings suggest that in the presence of Ndt80, Sum1 may be displaced from MSEs through a competition-based mechanism but that in the absence of Ndt80, Sum1 is removed from chromatin in a separate pathway requiring the phosphorylation of Sum1 by Ime2 and the inhibition of Hst1.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalPromoter Regions, GeneticDNA-Binding ProteinsHistone DeacetylasesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMeiosisMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesNuclear ProteinsPhosphorylationProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSirtuin 2SirtuinsTranscription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsHistone DeacetylasesHST1 protein, S cerevisiaeIME2 protein, S cerevisiaeIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesNDT80 protein, S cerevisiaeNuclear ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSirtuin 2SirtuinsSmk1 protein, S cerevisiaeSUM1 protein, S cerevisiaeTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID19528232
PMCPMC2725727
OpenAlexW2162524963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.