Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19527669›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2009

Absence of filamin A prevents cells from responding to stiffness gradients on gels coated with collagen but not fibronectin.

Fitzroy J Byfield, Qi Wen, Ilya Levental, Kerstin Nordstrom, Paulo E Arratia, R Tyler Miller, Paul A Janmey

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Modeling and finite element analysis of human trabecular meshwork outflow pathways].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Stiffness Sensing by Cells.Physiological reviews · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fitzroy J ByfieldInstitute for Medicine and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Qi Wen
Ilya Levental
Kerstin Nordstrom
Paulo E Arratia
R Tyler Miller
Paul A Janmey
University of Pennsylvania · USLouis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Mechanical control of cell growth and differentiationR01GM083272 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JANMEY, PAUL A · 2008 to 2011
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM083272NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell types from many tissues respond to changes in substrate stiffness by actively remodeling their cytoskeletons to alter spread area or adhesion strength, and in some cases changing their own stiffness to match that of their substrate. These cell responses to substrate stiffness are linked to substrate-induced changes in the state, localization, and amount of numerous proteins, but detailed evidence for the requirement of specific proteins in these distinct forms of mechanical response are scarce. Here we use microfluidics techniques to produce gels with a gradient of stiffness to show the essential function of filamin A in cell responses to mechanical stimuli and dissociate cell spreading and stiffening by contrasting responses of a pair of human melanoma-derived cell lines that differ in expression of this actin cross-linking protein. M2 melanoma cells null for filamin A do not alter their adherent area in response to increased substrate stiffness when they link to the substrate only through collagen receptors, but change adherent area normally when bound through fibronectin receptors. In contrast, filamin A-replete A7 cells change adherent area on both substrates and respond more strongly to collagen I-coated gels than to fibronectin-coated gels. Strikingly, A7 cells alter their stiffness, as measured by atomic force microscopy, to match the elastic modulus of the substrate immediately adjacent to them on the gradient. M2 cells, in contrast, maintain a constant stiffness on all substrates that is as low as that of A7 cells on the softest gels examined (1000 Pa). Comparison of cell spreading and cell stiffening on the same gradient substrates shows that cell spreading is uncoupled from stiffening. At saturating collagen and fibronectin concentrations, adhesion of M2 cells is reduced compared to that of A7 cells to an extent approximately equal to the difference in adherent area. Filamin A appears to be essential for cell stiffening on collagen, but not for cell spreading on fibronectin. These results have implications for different models of cell protrusion and adhesion and identify a key role for filamin A in altering cellular stiffness that cannot be compensated for by other actin cross-linkers in vivo.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionCell LineCollagenContractile ProteinsFibronectinsFilaminsGelsMelanomaMicrofilament ProteinsMicroscopy, Atomic ForceSubstrate SpecificityCollagenContractile ProteinsFibronectinsFilaminsGelsMicrofilament Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19527669
PMCPMC2712047
OpenAlexW2136097990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.