Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19526361›Full record

Trial reportCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2010

Sequential administration of dose-dense epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel/capecitabine for patients with HER2-negative and locally advanced or node-positive breast cancer.

Yago Nieto, José Manuel Aramendía, Jaime Espinós, Susana De la Cruz, Oscar Fernández-Hidalgo, Marta Santisteban, Leyre Arbea, Javier Aristu, Rafael Martínez-Monge, Marta Moreno and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yago NietoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. ynieto@mdanderson.org
José Manuel Aramendía
Jaime Espinós
Susana De la Cruz
Oscar Fernández-Hidalgo
Marta Santisteban
Leyre Arbea
Javier Aristu
Rafael Martínez-Monge
Marta Moreno
Luis Pina
Josu Sola
Gerardo Zornoza
Fernando Martínez Regueira
Clinica Universidad de Navarra · ESUniversidad de Navarra · ES

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Kathrin Milbury · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCapecitabine is effective against metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We hypothesized that sequential treatment with dose-dense epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) and docetaxel/capecitabine would be active and tolerable in the adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting.

methodsIn this prospective phase II clinical trial patients with HER2-negative and node-positive or locally advanced tumors were eligible to receive four cycles of EC (100/600 mg/m2) every 2 weeks with G-CSF on days 3-10, followed by four cycles of docetaxel/capecitabine (75/1,000 mg/m2 b.i.d., days 1-14) every 3 weeks.

resultsFifty-five patients were enrolled with median age of 49, and 80% had hormone receptor-positive disease. The median tumor size was 2.5 cm, with a median of two axillary nodes involved. Seventy-five percent of the first 20 patients had grade 2/3 hand-foot syndrome (HFS). Dose reduction of capecitabine to 800 mg/m2 reduced the grade 2/3 HFS incidence to 31% in the remaining patients. No grade 4/5 toxicities were observed. All 20 patients treated preoperatively responded, with 5 (25%) pathologic complete responses and 3 additional pT0N1 tumors. At a median follow-up of 48 (range 28-60) months, the event-free and overall survival rates are 91 and 98%, respectively.

conclusionsSequential treatment with dose-dense EC followed by docetaxel/capecitabine, using a lower capecitabine dose than that approved for MBC, has an acceptable toxicity profile and encouraging activity when used as neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCapecitabineCyclophosphamideDeoxycytidineDocetaxelDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleEpirubicinErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleFeverFluorouracilHumansCapecitabineCyclophosphamideDeoxycytidineDocetaxelEpirubicinErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFluorouracilTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID19526361
PMCPMC8261625
OpenAlexW2132940515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.