ArticleNeurotoxicity research2009
Nur(R1)turing a notion on the etiopathogenesis of Parkinson's disease.
Article in Neurotoxicity research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current understandings and perspectives of petroleum hydrocarbons in Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease: a global concern.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Review
- Effects of Postnatal Enriched Environment in a Model of Parkinson's Disease in Adult Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Article
- Exposure to atrazine during gestation and lactation periods: toxicity effects on dopaminergic neurons in offspring by downregulation of Nurr1 and VMAT2.International journal of molecular sciences · 2014Article
- Oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage and neurodegenerative diseases.Neural regeneration research · 2013Review
- RUTBC2 protein, a Rab9A effector and GTPase-activating protein for Rab36.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2012Article
- Future directions for immune modulation in neurodegenerative disorders: focus on Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The canonical histopathological feature of Parkinson's disease (PD) is the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the ventral midbrain. Although the common sporadic/idiopathic form of PD most often presents clinically at around 60 years of age when the levels of striatal dopamine and numbers of ventral dopaminergic neurons are posited to have declined by 80 and 60%, respectively, the temporal pattern of injury to these vulnerable cells is unknown. The conventional view is that PD results from an accelerated age-related loss of dopamine neurons. However, an alternative hypothesis is that dopamine neuron loss is a developmental phenomenon. What evidence might support this alternative view? Apart from the rare familial forms, wherein loss or gain of function mutations in single genes convey highly penetrant PD, sporadic disease is genetically complex and may have other contributory non-genetic components. Epidemiologic and twin studies have strongly implicated gene-environmental interaction as a pathogenic dyad in the etiology of PD. Among the most attractive candidates that may connect the environment to inherited vulnerability is the nuclear receptor, Nurr1. Encoding an orphan transcription factor that is expressed at high levels within discrete regions of the developing and adult mammalian brain, Nurr1 is essential for the formation of ventral midbrain dopamine neurons. Given the absence of a known lipophilic small molecule regulator and established transcriptional role in the formation of the definitive dopaminergic phenotype, Nurr1 represents an intriguing molecule to explore in the context of sporadic PD as a developmental disorder. The study described herein addresses two features of Nurr1 biology that provide plausibility for this hypothesis. First is the description of Nurr1 regulation of a potent dopaminergic neuronal trophic factor, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and second is the identification of a protein, termed Nurr1 interacting protein (NuIP) that appears to link upstream signaling pathways in the regulation of Nurr1 transcriptional activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.