ArticleInternational journal of imaging systems and technology2008
Composite MR Contrast Agents for Conditional Cell-Labeling.
Article in International journal of imaging systems and technology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tailoring Image Contrast for Cellular Magnetic Resonance Imaging using Gadolinium Chelates and Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Particles.Molecular imaging and biology · 2025Article
- Positive contrast visualization for cellular magnetic resonance imaging using susceptibility-weighted echo-time encoding.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gadolinium-chelates (Gd-DTPA) and superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide (SPIO) are two commonly used MR contrast agents that exhibit inherently different relaxation properties. These two agents have been used to label cells ex-vivo to generate signal contrast with respect to background tissue when introduced to a tissue-of-interest. Assuming minimal mutual interaction between these two agents, we were motivated to investigate the creation of composite relaxation properties by mixing the two in aqueous solutions for conditioning cell labeling. Concentration-dependent relaxivity coefficients were first obtained from each contrast agent, independently, in saline solution at 3 Tesla. These coefficients were then used to predict both the R(1) and R(2) relaxation rates of a composite contrast agent using a linear model combining the effects of both contrast media. The predicted relaxation rates were experimentally confirmed from 25 composite solutions (combinations of SPIO-concentration ranging from 0 to 1 mug/mL and Gd-DTPA-concentration ranging from 0 to 0.20 mM). We show that the combination of SPIO and Gd-DTPA in an aqueous solution exhibits unique and predictable relaxivity properties that are unattainable via the individual use of either agent. The method may be applied to create 'user-tunable' contrast conditions for the visualization of magnetically labeled cells in the context of cell replacement therapy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.