Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19525965›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2009

Effective, low-titer antibody protection against low-dose repeated mucosal SHIV challenge in macaques.

Ann J Hessell, Pascal Poignard, Meredith Hunter, Lars Hangartner, David M Tehrani, Wim K Bleeker, Paul W H I Parren, Preston A Marx, Dennis R Burton

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 397 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
397citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

397 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 542 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. ACS central science · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

337 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ann J HessellDepartment of Immunology and Microbial Science and International AIDS Vaccine Initiative Neutralizing Antibody Center, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
Pascal Poignard
Meredith Hunter
Lars Hangartner
David M Tehrani
Wim K Bleeker
Paul W H I Parren
Preston A Marx
Dennis R Burton
Genmab (United States) · USInternational AIDS Vaccine Initiative · USScripps Research Institute · USTulane University · USUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Antibody Effector Function in Protection Against HIV-1R37AI055332 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI BURTON, DENNIS R. · 2009 to 2018
$9.7M
ANTIBODY EFFECTOR FUNCTION IN PROTECTION AGAINST HIV-1R01AI055332 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI BURTON, DENNIS R. · 2003 to 2007
$3.8M
NIAID NIH HHS AI55332NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI055332NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI055332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutralizing antibodies are thought to be crucial for HIV vaccine protection, but studies in animal models suggest that high antibody concentrations are required. This is a major potential hurdle for vaccine design. However, these studies typically apply a large virus inoculum to ensure infection in control animals in single-challenge experiments. In contrast, most human infection via sexual encounter probably involves repeated exposures to much lower doses of virus. Therefore, animal studies may have provided an overestimate of the levels of antibodies required for protection in humans. We investigated whether plasma concentrations of antibody corresponding to relatively modest neutralization titers in vitro could protect macaques from repeated intravaginal exposure to low doses of a simian immunodeficiency virus-HIV chimera (SHIV) that uses the CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) co-receptor. An effector function-deficient variant of the neutralizing antibody was also included. The results show that a substantially larger number of challenges is required to infect macaques treated with neutralizing antibody than control antibody-treated macaques, and support the notion that effector function may contribute to antibody protection. Overall, the results imply that lower amounts of antibody than previously considered protective may provide benefit in the context of typical human exposure to HIV-1.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationChimeraHIVImmunizationImmunization ScheduleMacacaNeutralization TestsSAIDS VaccinesSimian Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeSimian Immunodeficiency VirusTitrimetryTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, ViralSAIDS Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID19525965
PMCPMC4334439
OpenAlexW2113822425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.